egafd.com

bluewomble858 wrote:

> then after the sex got started and they were dping her, she looked
> very uncomfortable, like she did'nt want to be their and that
> made me feel so uncomfortable, i stopped watching, stopped
> pleasuring myself and turned it off.


There's your answer right there: If it's floating your boat, keep watching and wanking. If on the other hand you find yourself not enjoying it for whatever reason, just turn it off. As you (presumably) would with a regular movie or a TV programme.

I think we're just going round in circles now bluewomble.

so in all due respect milk tray man, if a woman looks like she does'nt want to be there and if i don't get off on it. i should just excuse it as my taste and ignore the fact that she does'nt look up to it and shrug my shoulders and leave??? i got the impression she did'nt want to be there, she was only their for the money.

you should'nt do things strickly for money. i know society is into this idea of wage labour, but i'm sorry. that's just not how i opperate. i'm not going to do a job if i don't love it and do it to the best of my ability. some have called me a socialist because i don't like the idea of the golden carrot being dangled in the face of the working class and the idea of this dream of if you work hard, you will get ahead. when black sabbath got it right, your really killing yourself to live. george carlin also got it right about over here in the states, "they call it the american dream for a reason, you have to be asleep to believe it."

your viewpoint is exactly what i disagree with. a woman being only seen as a sex toy for us men to get our jollies off of or as a commodity, for the production companies to hype and promote because of vanity and not human qualities. i'm all for sex, i'm all for hot steamy raunchy sex. but if it's to celebrate the woman as who she is, a woman. women are smart, women are strong and powerful, women are gentle, women are loving and kind, but most of all, women are our equals, not our subordinates.

not to mention, if a man gets off on seeing a woman being choked, slapped, having her hair pulled, having to get on her knees at the feet of a male to please him as some common dog. not to mention the fact of having to be called a slut, a whore, a bitch and other names which degrade said woman and lower her self-esteem. i don't approve of it at all. in fact, i lothe it. i believe any man who gets off on this kind of behavior has something wrong with him.

i know some will disagree with me and i can expect that because i've been different all my life. i always have thought outside the box and don't like comformity. as dave mason sang "it's only you and me and we just disagree."

cheers and thanks for reading.

bluewomble858 wrote:

> your viewpoint is exactly what i disagree with. a woman being
> only seen as a sex toy for us men to get our jollies off of or
> as a commodity, for the production companies to hype and
> promote because of vanity and not human qualities.

Eh?

You're obviously not listening. Or have forgotten. And you're definitely putting words into my mouth - which I very much object to.

As I said higher up in the thread: "It's good that you see the performers as human beings because that's what they are". I also share your distaste of the demeaning and exploitative stuff, which is why I just avoid it in the first place (and I suggest you do likewise if you find it objectionable).

As I said, you're just going round in circles now. End of the day only you can decide whether you should stop watching porn or not.

i see your point and applogize if you have the impression i put words in your mouth. that was clearly not my intention.

i also do not believe i am going "around in circles" as you believe. i still watch porn, i just watched some porn a hour ago. i'm just more selective on what i watch. the fact of the matter is i love to watch it, i just ask for production companies not to forget these people are human beings and that should not be sacrificed for us, the viewers, sake.

cheers and once again, thanks for reading.

can somebody explain this logic for me??? i'd been reading wikipedia about cuckold and i don't get it. a man knowingly allows his wife to cheat on him in order for him to watch her have sex with other man and is geting off on being embarrased. it makes no sense to me.

first off, why would anybody get off on being embarrased??? i know i would not. i would be mentally scared for life and it would take me years of theropy to even try to get over somebody i love and trust cheating on me. it's not the cheating part that irks me, it's the fact you are heartless enough to do it in front of me.

i know i'm not the sexiest man on earth, i quite honestly joke that a woman would have to be blind to find me attractive. but i believe if i'm in a relationship, their must be trust and the idea of cuckold does'nt really work for me.

dr. evelin lindner says that humilitation is "the nuclear bomb of the emotions" and dr. roy baumeister says that cuckolding is a form of excapism.

to quote linda richman, discuss.