Page 3 of 5

Robches

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:38 pm
by David Johnson
I will leave you to the bizarre world you inhabit Robches where:

Opinion is the same as evidence.

Failure to agree with opinion is complacency and "political correctness".

You can state that Pakistani gangs have killed white girls in Blackpool without any prima facie evidence.

YOu refuse to give your evidence to back up your statement.

YOu are careful not to state a specific person(s) by name in your statement that they are murderers. Any particular reason Robches?

Failure to convict in a court of law with a jury means they must be guilty because that is your opinion.

!laugh! !laugh! !laugh!

Re: Political correctness gone mad?

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 2:48 pm
by Robches
David:

There was prima facie evidence, because a case was brought to court. But as I said, you have fixed on the murder trials, because the accused were found not guilty (the girls are still missing of course, will their bodies ever be found, or were they really turned into kebabs? Their parents might like to know one day). But obviously you cannot deny the reality of Pakistani Muslim rape gangs, which have been proven in court, so you choose not to address it. Seriously, you are deluded.

Robches

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:06 pm
by David Johnson
"But obviously you cannot deny the reality of Pakistani Muslim rape gangs, which have been proven in court, so you choose not to address it"

You appear totally unable to understand basic English. I have already stated numerous times on this forum that I am delighted that the Asian Muslim gang in Rochdale were convicted of paedophilia.

WHat do I have to do for you to get that? Tattoo it on your forehead so you can see it in the mirror every morning?

Again for those like yourself who seemingly struggle with basic English, the entire purpose of this thread is about the political correctness argument (the subject might give you a hint!). I do not personally see the failure to convict the Pakistani Rochdale paedophiles earlier as an example of New Labour political correctness.

If that were true then maybe someone can explain the underlying political correctness shown to Muslims by New Labour in the following:

1. Rochdale. Police amass evidence. CPS refuse to prosecute due to unreliability of witness.

2. Blackpool. Police amass evidence. CPS agrees to prosecute. Jury fail to convict.

3. New Labour introduce equivalent of Operation Trident in London for dealing with Asian gang crime.

4. New Labour introduce Forced Marriages Act.

5. New Labour launch a war on Iraq, viewed as illegal by the UN and many countries and play their part in the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi Muslims.

Got it yet?

Re: Political correctness gone mad?

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:23 pm
by Sam Slater
You talk of young girls being made into kebabs (racist) and you have the temerity to call David deluded?


Sam

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:51 pm
by David Johnson
To be fair to Robches, as far as I recall, the re-trial was abandoned due to issues, amongst a whole host of others, relating to the concealed recording of conversations which the suspect (kebab shop owner) was having. My recall was as part of this conversation there was a jokey reference by the suspect to CHarlene Downes being made into kebabs.

Re: Political correctness gone mad?

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:54 pm
by Robches
Sam Slater wrote:

> You talk of young girls being made into kebabs (racist) and you
> have the temerity to call David deluded?
>

If you looked into it you would find that that was evidence given at the trial of those accused of murdering Paige Chivers. But as David points out, the accused were found not guilty, and Paige's body has never been found. Nothing to see here folks, please move along.

Re: Political correctness gone mad?

Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:00 pm
by Sam Slater
Apologies for jumping to conclusions.


Re: Robches

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 10:04 am
by Toliverwist
*********************************************
David Johnson
Date: 06-09-12 18:09

Do you find it more or less horrifying than white blokes who go on organised sex tours to Thailand to take advantage of poor, vulnerable women? They look down on the Asian girls because they are poor scum who are not going to complain?

Does the colour of the women's skin increase/decrease the "particular" level of horror or stay the same?
*********************************************

Paedophiles are evil and should be equally condemned whoever they are or wherever they are.

Do you have the figures for the proportion of White Brit expats, that have settled in Thailand, who seek out and groom Asian girls for paedophile gang banging?

Such expats need to be hunted down and dealt with as severely as Thai law allows.


Tolivertwist

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:09 pm
by David Johnson
"Paedophiles are evil and should be equally condemned whoever they are or wherever they are."


Agree entirely

"Do you have the figures for the proportion of White Brit expats, that have settled in Thailand, who seek out and groom Asian girls for paedophile gang banging?"

Of course not. NOr do people have accurate figures for the UK

Re: Tolivertwist

Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 1:23 pm
by Sam Slater
Just a slight point on this comparison which you may want to take into account.

Thailand is known for, and for too long promoted itself as, 'sin city'. A good proportion of tourism was about easy, cheap sex. If there is a high proportion of Brits sexually exploiting young girls in Thailand it isn't because Brits have a larger proportion of sexual exploiters compared to other nationalities, but because the culture and access to cheap, easy sex in Thailand encouraged people of a certain type to go there.

This is different to why Muslims move to the UK, which is mainly about a better way of life.