egafd.com

The only reason I can think of, Terry, is that the girl getting shot isn't really getting shot, whilst the one being fucked and spunked really is getting the works.

Unlike boxing where the object is for two burly men to inflict brain damage on each other until one passes out. Some of that damage is permanent causing boxes to have a high incidence of Alzhiemers and Parkinson's diseases. And that's apart from the facial injuries.

Occasionally a boxer will be critically injured in the ring, in front of a paying live TV audience, or even die.

But that's supposed to be OK because they give informed consent to take the risks.

Seriously though, I know what you mean. Boxing's one thing, but I can't understand why anybody would want to watch that extreme kick boxing (or whatever it's called) that's shown these days. Actual violence repulses me. I'm not saying that they should allow porn (soft core or hardcore) on any channels that kids might accidentally see. But I get your point about violence, I don't see the appeal myself....

Tuesday night's episode of Spartacus showed a gladaitor beong hit several times in the head with a large mallet, in glorious close up and slow mo. At midnight last night half the babe channel girls were not even topless. I am so glad we are being protected from a few tits by an equally well qualified bunch og tits...and as for MMA....

Yes, I have never really understood the "violence is OK because it's not real but sex is not OK because it is" argument. I think anti-porn campaigners just use whatever argument suits them, not what they really believe. Would an explicit sex scene be OK if it used very real prosthetics?

Provided there are adequate controls to prevent kids watching, and to prevent sensitive souls tuning in by accident, and a choice of other material, where's the harm? Why not allow soft-core porn on late night Free To Air TV and hard-core on late night encrypted channels?

Go on, sign the government petition http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/13222

Looking at the quality of smut shoved in front of British TV viewers,
please God, anything but more of it !! Its awful enough as it is !

That's part of the point. The rules are so tight the gails can hardly do anything and producers are afraid to let them do anything that's not safe.

For safe read dull.

A couple of years ago we had two babes in a bath playing enthusiastically. Today two babes daren't even snog with tongues.

Anyone remember when knicker rubbing, dental floss thongs and present dildo play were standard? Or when babes would sit on the cameraman for POV?

Full strength swearing, violence, blasphemy and offensive jokes are allowed after the watershed, but if a babe channel approaches cert 15 strength in the middle of the night it gets stomped on by Ofcom.

Why? Who are these morality police? Do they really represent what ordinary people think? Show them they are wrong, that people wanting a relaxation of the rules out-number the censorship lobby 10 to 1.

Vote at http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/13222

659 signatures so far. Let's show the government that people with a healthy interest in sex far out-number the narrow minded prudes.

Arousing non-explicit shows used to be allowed on late night TV.

Explicit live-shows used to be allowed on encrypted pay channels.

Why not now? Because of a handful of complaints by people who select channels deliberately to be offended.

Sign up now and demonstrate support, or sit back, do nothing and wait for the internet to be censored too.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/13222

If you watch so called porn on TV I feel sorry for you.
There is enough "Hard" porn availlable on line, and a lot is FREE, much to the chagrin of Lady Sonia, Jimslip and Ben Dover, to name just 3. The other advantage is that there is so much choice, which you just wouldn't get on late tv.

"If you watch so called porn on TV I feel sorry for you.
There is enough "Hard" porn availlable on line, and a lot is FREE, much to the chagrin of Lady Sonia, Jimslip and Ben Dover, to name just 3. The other advantage is that there is so much choice, which you just wouldn't get on late tv.
RoddersUK"

Fair enough, but you could say exactly the same about top shelf porn in the newsagents or DVDs in sex shops.

Why should n't adults be able to decide for themselves, instead of nanny state deciding for us.