Damage limitation or Coincidence?
-
- Posts: 4113
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Damage limitation or Coincidence?
McDonald's is a very poor example as their business operation is clearly completely different from Pizza Hut. Nandos is a better example, and they do make everybody pay first whatever your ethnicity, sexual orientation or age. My objection to that way of working is if I decide later in the meal I want a pud, I wouldn't want to have to go through the credit card bit again.
Re: Damage limitation or Coincidence?
Agreed, Nandos is a better example.
The way they operate though is the template for how Pizza Hut is going to have to operate if they are going to ask customers to pay up-front.
They ask everybody to pay up-front or no-one to pay up front.
If they ask certain customers to pay up-front and others not to pay up front, they leave themselves open to accusations of discrimination.
I agree with what you say about the pud, but the answer is to go elsewhere if you don't like the way that restaurant operates.
The way they operate though is the template for how Pizza Hut is going to have to operate if they are going to ask customers to pay up-front.
They ask everybody to pay up-front or no-one to pay up front.
If they ask certain customers to pay up-front and others not to pay up front, they leave themselves open to accusations of discrimination.
I agree with what you say about the pud, but the answer is to go elsewhere if you don't like the way that restaurant operates.