Page 3 of 5

Re: The battle for Barking

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:04 pm
by justincyder
just devils advocate here but for those who are obviously very pro immigration, if it ever got to the point where immigrants outnumbered the indigenous population many years from now would it be acceptable then for them to impose their laws over ours and displacing us?

I'll probably be dead by then so I don't actually even care :) Abit of shariah law might tidy up the pissheads and pain in the arse students.

Re: Max

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:07 pm
by andy at handiwork
I'm an atheist but wore a kappah in a synagogue at a Jewish friend's funeral recently, when I visit a church I take off my hat on entering and filming in a mosque a while back I removed my shoes and washed my hands first; simple respect for other people beliefs even if they aren't mine, that's all.

Justincyderl

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 6:59 pm
by David Johnson
"just devils advocate here but for those who are obviously very pro immigration, if it ever got to the point where immigrants outnumbered the indigenous population many years from now would it be acceptable then for them to impose their laws over ours and displacing us?

I'll probably be dead by then so I don't actually even care :) Abit of shariah law might tidy up the pissheads and pain in the arse students."

According to the 2001 UK Census, 2.7% of the population described themselves as Muslim.

I am very worred about the country being taken over by Man City fans because as we know they are an extremely homogenous group like Muslims. However as we know I think there is a real risk at being taken over by Catholics. Like Muslims, all Catholics think exactly the same and would force their religious views on the rest of us. On the other hand, quite a few of the Muslims I know drink alcohol. I am worried that if the Muslims breed like rabbits so they go from being 2.7% of the 2001 census results to 98%, they will force me by law to drink alcohol. In Morocco, Muslims have lived together in peace with Jews and Christians for centuries. Does that mean that if Muslims become the majority of the UK population I will be forced to live with Jews and Christians? In Lebanon, Christians launched attacks on Muslims, slaughtering them in refugee camps. In Iraq, a country that formerly had elements of religious tolerance has, post illegal invasion seen attacks by Muslims on Christians. Does that mean if..............oh I am so worried.


Acting as a devil's advocate, are my concerns justified?

Have a good weekend

Cheers
D

Re: Lizard

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:37 pm
by Lizard
David (I'm not going to be posting till the new year) Johnson wrote.... "Against the BNP, what a vile bastard Margaret Hodge is."
That's correct, she is.

Then David (I'm not going to be posting till the new year) wrote....

"Work it out for yourself Einstein. The last time I looked at the BNP Constitution it stated that a key aim of the BNP is to take Britain back to its ethnic makeup of pre 1948 ie. before West Indians, Asians, Chinese etc arrived here in any significant numbers. Barnbrook stated in the film that he wanted to take Dagenham back to the 1960's."

Quite why I'm not sure, I didn't even mention the BNP, I was quoting Hodge, you utter cretin.
Read the fucking post, and watch the film, before you offer your dull opinion.

Now, fuck off till the New year, please.


David Johnson

Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:54 pm
by max_tranmere
David,

Your posts get stranger and stranger. I managed about half the text of what you typed here then gave up. Most of the posts you have ever typed on this forum attempt a balance between information (as you see it), irony, and sarcasm. You rarely get the balance right. And the way you try and sign-off with a wink and a smirk with 'have a good weekend' (or something similar) doesn't work either.

Wink wink!, Max!

or how about: see ya bud! Max!

or: cheers dood! Maxy-baby!!

or, ... oh I give up...

Re: The battle for Barking

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:20 am
by davey
Totally agree.in that film when the BNP are standing on Dagenham heathway a black man walks past and says "fuck off you lot i hate you all white trash".how do you feel about the subjsct of black racism against whites?The BNP ran a campaign recently called "it cuts both ways"highlighting the large amount of knife attacks and murders of whites by blacks which never get mentioned in the media and calling for the police and authorities to tackle the hugely disproportionate amount of these crimes.i take it you support them in this?


Poor old Lizard

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:53 am
by David Johnson
"Quite why I'm not sure, I didn't even mention the BNP, I was quoting Hodge, you utter cretin.
Read the fucking post, and watch the film, before you offer your dull opinion."

Oh dear, what a slow reptile you are. And a little potty mouthed, if truth were told.

1. I have seen the film and very good it is.
2. I have read your post and very poor it is.
3. I am fully aware that it was Hodge that made the statement you refer to in your reptilian post.
4. Why did you think Hodge said what she did about the Chinese woman being deported? Answer, because she believes that the BNP can only meet their stated objectives via forced deportations
5. This is why I posted the following comment which you referred to in a somewhat silly way.
"Work it out for yourself Einstein. The last time I looked at the BNP Constitution it stated that a key aim of the BNP is to take Britain back to its ethnic makeup of pre 1948 ie. before West Indians, Asians, Chinese etc arrived here in any significant numbers. Barnbrook stated in the film that he wanted to take Dagenham back to the 1960's."

Got it now, my extremely slow reptilian friend?

Cheers
D

No reptiles were humiliated too much in this post.

Max

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 11:54 am
by David Johnson
You either disagree with or do not understand my point.

Am I surprised? No.

CHeers
D

Re: Justincyderl

Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:30 pm
by justincyder
DJ

~if it ever got to the point where immigrants outnumbered the indigenous population many years from now would it be acceptable then for them to impose their laws over ours and displacing us?~

I said if!! and I know the figures on percentages. But nonetheless based on an outside chance of it occuring long after we're both dead what would your theoretical thought be?

toodles