Page 3 of 3
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 6:29 pm
by Seymour Clearly
Irod is the the new Apple vibrator...
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:39 pm
by crofter
Deano! - I notice that you say that very truthfully and from the heart ...
BUT the only problem being you are based the other side of the fucking planet dude.
So until such time as you hear her whining voice every 5 minutes and hear in great detail who or what her trisexual cage fighting boyfriend tried to shag ... then please stick to the medication.
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:21 am
by Deano!
Crofter - its true that I don't really know what I'm talking about - but this IS the BGAFD - the home of the armchair expert.
I'm simply extrapolating from similar experiences with hot chickie-babes on Aussie TV.
If they're good lookers they always get ridiculed but droves of viewers keep watching.
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:40 am
by crofter
Yeah I thought you were extrapolating Deano! ... thats exactly what I thought!!
If you want Kylie and her Sister plus Natalie Imbruglia sent packing back to Oz just give me a shout ... I can maybe throw in that big titted bird from Neighbors if you need a deal maker or breaker - gotta wait til the new year though as she is currently in Panto ... Oh yes she is.
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Sat Oct 31, 2009 9:21 am
by Deano!
I love having a good extrapolate.
You speak of "that big titted bird from Neighbours". Is that Eliza Cotter who played Janae a few years back? If it is, then you've no idea how many times I extrapolated myself off while fantasising that I was titty fucking her.
Send Kylie and her squeaky sis back by all means. You've got enough spunkin' hotties in the UK anyway you greedy cunts.
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:33 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
The only fools max are the ones that keep buying and watching everything she appears on
Dont like her...tune out..turn off...dont comment...move on to someone/something that else
All these famous for being famous types are pretty smart cookies in that they have very little real talent but what they have somehow they've made it pay big time
Of course it helps if you have no shame as money cant buy the one thing almost all of these famous for being famous people will never have
Class
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 6:49 am
by Flat_Eric
Sam Slater wrote:
>>
Well first and foremost Sam, she's probably doing her kids long-term harm: Dysfunctional mother, dysfunctional lifestyle lived (by her own choosing) in a goldfish bowl, blokes coming in and out of their lives and no constant male role model - how do you think they're going to turn out?
And that's even leaving aside the daft names she's lumbered them with, LOL! I mean 'Princess Tiaamii' - for fuck's sake!!!!
>>
I think you're very much overstating her importance with regard to keeping the unemployment figures down Sam.
Beyond perhaps some sort of personal assistant, a nanny for her fashion-accessory kids and maybe a minder or two, I doubt that she actually employs anyone directly. All those sleazy PR people (the Max Clifford types), the tabolid newspapers, the trashy celeb mags etc. certainly don't depend solely on Jordan for a living. Sure, she might boost sales of an issue from time to time and bring in a bit of extra wedge, but she's certainly not their only source of income - or even their *main* source of income. She's just one of many, and they'd manage quite well without her, I think.
>>
Media whore / publicity junkie is probably a more accurate description.
Are you a fan, Sam? You'll be telling us next that her "autobiographies" weren't ghost-written, LOL!!
- Eric
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:26 pm
by Trumpton
Deano! wrote:
> Jordan is a fucking jizz magnet.
What evidence do you have to prove this?
> Here is a girl who has devoted her life so far to driving us
> men utterly mad in a nice way.
A "girl"?? Well, she has driven some men mad - but NOT in a nice way.
> The only reason a girl gets her
> tits pumped full of silicon is to please us.
Who is "us"?
> And all you can do is criticise.
We will criticise her (and her fawning sycophants in, and out of the PR machine that surrounds 'It') because on a day when more British troops have been pointlessly killed fighting in a unwinnable war, many "news"papers STILL have 'It''s' fizzog plastered over their main page!
> Outrageous.
It's outrageous that the British government have got the military involved in an ill-prepared, illegal war that has no exit strategy. And will cost the lives of more and more British soldiers.
> It's not her fault that she's over exposed.
Yes it is. 'It' would be at the opening of an envelope if there was a camera present.
> She doesn't control TV networks and newspapers.
They control many though.
> They willingly feature her and millions of fans buy papers or tune in.
They feature 'It' because they know that muppets out there will buy their tawdry papers - it's all about commerce.
> I do not understand this strange hatred of sexy girls, but its
> becoming fashionable.
There is a huge difference between 'sexy girls' and this vomit inducing pile of excrement.
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart
Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:16 am
by Seymour Clearly
They should use her for target practice...
Re: Katie Price turned down for 'Forces Sweetheart' !
Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 9:32 am
by Ron T. Storm
I just wish she would retire and but the press love her.