Re: Where would Ringo be now if not for The Beatles?
Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2009 4:14 pm
As someone who is a Beatles fan and was around when they started many of you may not know the Pete Best / Ringo story.
For about 2 years in the 1960/1961 period (before they had a recording contract) the band was John, Paul, George and Pete Best.
Pete's mother owned a cafe where the Bealtes played and Pete went with them when they did their stints in Hamburg. He toured round the UK with them and was a permanent member of the band.
He was also rather handsome so got a lot of attention from the girls (much to John and Paul's annoyance).
Their manager Brian Epsein was trying to get them a recording contract and took tapes round to various labels but nobody was interested (they do sound pretty poor on those demos).
Eventualy they signed to Parlaphone and did some test songs in June 1962.
George Martin, the producer, felt Best was not that great a drummer so said he would use a session musician for their first proper recordings.
Around this time John and Paul told manager Epstein to fire Pete Best (in August 1962) and told him they wanted Ringo (they already knew Ringo from playing with him at various events, he may have even jammed with them).
So on the verge of their success Pete Best was out and Ringo was in.
Best was sacked in August 1962, their first "proper" single as the Beatles was released in September 1962, and the rest is history.
I have always considered Pete Best a VERY unlucky man, although nobody knows if they would have been as successful with him in the band.
Ringo certainly had a quirkiness that people liked, he had a good sense of humour, and was not a threat to John and Paul, so helped the dynamics of the band to work. His drumming seemed "just right" for the band.
Often in a sports team it is the team who have the best BLEND of players that succeeds, not just the team having all the best players.
I think Ringo gave the Beatles the right blend.
For about 2 years in the 1960/1961 period (before they had a recording contract) the band was John, Paul, George and Pete Best.
Pete's mother owned a cafe where the Bealtes played and Pete went with them when they did their stints in Hamburg. He toured round the UK with them and was a permanent member of the band.
He was also rather handsome so got a lot of attention from the girls (much to John and Paul's annoyance).
Their manager Brian Epsein was trying to get them a recording contract and took tapes round to various labels but nobody was interested (they do sound pretty poor on those demos).
Eventualy they signed to Parlaphone and did some test songs in June 1962.
George Martin, the producer, felt Best was not that great a drummer so said he would use a session musician for their first proper recordings.
Around this time John and Paul told manager Epstein to fire Pete Best (in August 1962) and told him they wanted Ringo (they already knew Ringo from playing with him at various events, he may have even jammed with them).
So on the verge of their success Pete Best was out and Ringo was in.
Best was sacked in August 1962, their first "proper" single as the Beatles was released in September 1962, and the rest is history.
I have always considered Pete Best a VERY unlucky man, although nobody knows if they would have been as successful with him in the band.
Ringo certainly had a quirkiness that people liked, he had a good sense of humour, and was not a threat to John and Paul, so helped the dynamics of the band to work. His drumming seemed "just right" for the band.
Often in a sports team it is the team who have the best BLEND of players that succeeds, not just the team having all the best players.
I think Ringo gave the Beatles the right blend.