Page 3 of 4
Re: Appeal Failed
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:07 am
by Peter
Celebrity Big Brother anyone?
Re: Dwain Chambers
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:25 am
by Robches
I see my legal opinion has been vindicated. Call me Rumpole.
Re: Appeal Failed
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:25 am
by Kellyh
What about Rio Ferdinand then?
He's a drug cheat but he stills play for the national team...
I know different sports have different rules but on a moral stand point.
Re: Dwain Chambers
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:53 am
by Lizard
Shame that, he seems ever such a nice man.
Re: Rio Ferdinand
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 9:56 am
by Ace
Rio, as much as I detest his boorish behaviour didn't fail a drug test, he missed one.
Its well-known that he 'deliberately' missed it as he had 'charlie' in his system and rather than get caught and an imminent 2 year ban, he gambled and took a 10 month ban for missing it.
Its given him a kick up the arse to the point he took his role more seriously and played better, although still a prize cunt if you ask me..........and before anyone has a pop at me for 'dissing' Rio, I am quite happy to take it on the chin that we (Chelsea) had 2 players caught with 'charlie' in their system, Adrian Mutu and Mark Bosnich, and we did the right thing and fucked 'em both off.
Re: Rio Ferdinand
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:01 am
by Lizard
"Rio, as much as I detest his boorish behaviour didn't fail a drug test, he missed one.
Its well-known that he 'deliberately' missed it as he had 'charlie' in his system and rather than get caught and an imminent 2 year ban, he gambled and took a 10 month ban for missing it."
That was my point though ace, you say "it's well known etc", so you mean he HAD taken a far harder drug, so he got banned and was then allowed to play on, making him a better player, so why not Chambers?
Re: Rio Ferdinand
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:24 am
by Peter
Lizard wrote:
> That was my point though ace, you say "it's well known etc", so
> you mean he HAD taken a far harder drug, so he got banned and
> was then allowed to play on, making him a better player, so why
> not Chambers?
>
>
Isn't it just simply about the BOA has a lifetime ban, the FA doesn't?
Chambers did the crime fully knowing what the 'time' was if he got caught, then whinged that the time was too harsh.
Re: Rio Ferdinand
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:28 am
by Lizard
I dont know. So if your caught by the FA with a syringe sticking out of your arm, you dont get a lifetime ban, but with athletics you do? that would not surprise me, you can do a prison term for GBH, the come out and carry on as normal in football.
Re: Rio Ferdinand
Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:28 am
by beutelwolf
Lizard wrote:
> "Rio, as much as I detest his boorish behaviour didn't fail a
> drug test, he missed one.
> Its well-known that he 'deliberately' missed it as he had
> 'charlie' in his system and rather than get caught and an
> imminent 2 year ban, he gambled and took a 10 month ban for
> missing it."
>
> That was my point though ace, you say "it's well known etc", so
> you mean he HAD taken a far harder drug, so he got banned and
> was then allowed to play on, making him a better player, so why
> not Chambers?
He's allowed to compete (as he served his ban), just not at the Olympics. Rio would be banned as well from that.