Page 3 of 4
Re: War of the Worlds: Review.
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:24 pm
by dean1234
Watched the film its crap cruise could not act hlmself out of a paper bag
the only good thing in the film was the special effects and they were so so
the orginal was ten times better
it always the same with remakes 90% of the time they suck big time
i was hoping the dead ray would get cruise in the beginning but the aliens missed him boooo
most of the acting by the so called actors was really wooden or just plain bad
and the story line if there is one is pants
i mean the aliens machines buried for millons of years and no one has ever found one (yeah right)
should have got time team there they would have found half dozen of the machines lol
sorry to say 2 out of 10 at a push
Re: War of the Worlds
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:06 am
by Jock Strap
Yeah, saw it tonight and it is shit.
Spielberg makes bland movies nowadays. I nearly fell asleep. No plot, no suspense, just the usual wham-bang-thank you mam effects. Not enough.
Now, Batman Begins - there was a movie. Brilliant.
I'm going to see Inside Deep Throat tomorrow night. Will feel a little embarrased if it's a girl on the ticket counter....
Re: War of the Worlds
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:35 am
by Jock Strap
lol
well I will give you a FULL review tomorrow night.
let's hope its a bloke on the counter. at least I can give him a nudge and a wink.
say no more.
Re: War of the Worlds
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 12:06 pm
by dean1234
** WARNING: SPOILERS **
Watched the film and it was crap
cruise could not act himself out of a paper bag all the main actors were really wooden and just plain rubbish
the film has no plot the only good thing in the film was the special effects and they were so so
was hoping the aliens dead ray would get cruise in the start of the film but the buggers missed him
i mean come on alien machines buried for million years and no one ever found one (yeah right)
should have got the time team there they would have found half adozen of them LOL
so basicly bad acting no plot no story line so keep your money in your pocket
but alot of people will go and watch it because cruise is in it
Like most remakes of film those days 90% of them are really poor and the orginals are the best ones still
had to put the warning spoiler on top as my first review was removed for giving away revealing important plot twists , what plot twists there isnt any
hopefully this one will not be removed
1 out of 10 at a push
Re: War of the Worlds
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:46 pm
by Jayr
Ok but can I ask what spoilers?
I mean if you've read the book, seen the 1953 Movie, listened to the 1978 Musical Version by Jeff Wayne or even watched the TV series in the (late 80's?) early 90's what is there to spoil?
Re: War of the Worlds
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 4:01 pm
by dean1234
thats my point others put the same things as me and they dont have to put
spoiler warning, i put to make sure it dont get removed again
Re: War of the Worlds
Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2005 4:35 pm
by Guilbert
*** Warning Spoliers ***
Titanic - Ship sinks at the end
Pearl Harbour - Nasty japs bomb US navel base
Phyco - He was dressed as his mother
ET - He goes home
Jaws - They kill the shark
Love Actually - Eveyone falls in love with everyone else
Notting Hill - They get together at the end, ditto Four Weddings and a funeral
Harry Potter films - He defeats the baddies and survives
Bambi - His mother dies
Appolo 13 - They all get back alive