Piers Morgan - Sacked

[jj]

".......the fact that these particular photos were fakes........does not detract from the fact that there is substantial evidence...."

Yes, it does: he wasn't the first journo to raise this issue, and those others managed to do so without recourse to fabricating evidence- as you say, the evidence was there for those with eyes to see.
He has trivialised a serious subject, denigrated his 'profession' ('tabloid journalist' an oxymoron, surely?) and made it harder for future investigations to gain the trust and help of the military.

[Lizard]

I cant believe Morgan took the photo,s at face value, and just published them without checking there authenticity, why didn,t he publish a disclaimer along with them, stating they had printed them in the absoloute belief they were a true account, I just dont believe he wouldn,t have checked them and checked them again, however I wouldn,t have too much sympathy for him, he will be back, I dont like the loathsome turd anyway.

[Lizard]

No, you know what I mean Magg,s, photo,s or no photo,s there are just some people that grind your gears, and makes you want to beat them soundly, and he,s one of them, whether he should have been sacked, is really up to his paymasters, I just find it incredible that he would have gone ahead and published them with out 100% belief.
I,m not sure I have read stonevids comments on soldiers, I will go and check, however if he has never been a soldier, he should shut the fuck up.

hope this helps.

[Pervert]

Careful, Liz----you are showing violent tendencies in your language. That's upsetting to some, and symptomatic of beating people up in your spare time.

[Lizard]

It will probably get deleted, and rightly so!, however you should be careful about making such sweeping generalisation,s unless you have some experience, then you can judge!