Page 3 of 4

Re: Oooo-er!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:40 pm
by Lizard
I forget meself at times Maggs, thanks for the update on me....:-), I was just questioning Mr Jacobs,s knowledge of the Badger/Davies incident, you know, who tried to bugger who!...


Re: Oooo-er!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:52 pm
by mart
In the words of the Bible "It is better to give than to receive" and he was avoiding the sin of Onan.
The Rasta, I mean.

Mart


Re: Oooo-er!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:58 pm
by jj
magoo wrote:

> Dont be obtuse. I though Duece was deliberately making a joke
> by misunderstanding but now youve done the same joke.
I made that post before DB's.
>
> I was saying that referring to woman as dogs is sexist. Nothing
> to do with the sex of any canines.
I was trying to point up that to accuse someone of sexism on a porn-forum seems a tad redundant. And all over a (very weak) pun.........

> I of course am far more modern and refer to women as bitches or
> ho's.
Isn't a bitch a female dog?
And, so, having returned to our starting-point: likl your new tag-line. Very witty.

Re: Oooo-er!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 6:58 pm
by mart
Read about it here


Mart


Re: Oooo-er!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:00 pm
by jj
"Milking badgers is illegal too".


Good God. You learn something new every day.
I certainly won't be drinking any more badger's milk, then.

Re: Oooo-er!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2004 7:02 pm
by jj
I walk my neighbour's dog, silly.

Oh, and it was 1980, I think. And it was Cullercoats.