egafd.com

So why would a white in her mid thirties be any less likely to be a terrorist than an eastern european I ask?

Anybody could be a terrorist not just those who fit the desciption of the hijackers which is why racial profiling is a waste of time IMHO

We recently had a white man with links to a local Muslim society arrested and shown to be a subversive.He'd converted to Muslim several years previously

You'll never be 100 percent safe no matter how good the security

I'm more than happy to be searched but would draw the line at the anal probe

cheers
B....OZ

No of course not

I'm saying all should be screened not just those of Arab descent
as my recent case in Australia proves

You just don't know who's likely to be involved

I'd bet london to a dollar that there are left & right wing militants all over the world looking to make their mark under the disguise of Al Queda

For all we know those hidden 50 or 60 cells may well be include white anti establishment groups

Expect the unexpected from terrorists is all I'm saying

cheers
B....OZ

And let's remember that in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing extreme Muslim groups, including al Qaida, were being blamed, when it was in fact home grown terrorists. Sadly, lunacy knows no bounds.

tell you what Bimmercat,all those islamic fundementalist retards were at one one time were chummy mates with those jolly japesters sein fein in northern ireland when America thought that they were freedom fighters fighting a noble cause:ie the British, when the politics was farmore complicated than any body realised.
Going around Belfast10/15 years ago Andy Worhol himeslf would have been impressed withn the quality of the murals and paintings depicting Sein fein/IRA and Hizbollah together in eletric dreams,that was until sept.11

Of course, because Timothy McVeigh was not an average looking, white, all American looking guy.

this has been common knowledge in the states since day one and was broadcast on major news channels such as cnn.
the uk however never got any of this side of the story.
i was surprised when i visited the states for a month in the march after 19.11 how different a story the UK and the US had.

Bet u didnt know that the US government wanted to drill up the arctic for oil since they wouldnt be getting any from oslama. All the conservation organisations kicked up a fuss tho. Not forgetting the arctic ISNT owned by any country and there for can never be drilled up anyway.

its all about oil isnt it?

steve56 wrote:

> its all about oil isnt it?

*************************************

It's mostly about the oil... Why else would the US still be so chummy with a country that has financially backed al-quadea, provided most of the guys who flew the planes on 9/11, turns a blind eye to the vicious subjugation of a people by it's government, etc., etc.

If you thought Saddam's rule in Iraq needed "regime change" then what does Saudi Arabia need? Obviously to be left alone, so that we (Britain, US, etc.) can still get the oil?

The other reason for Gulf War II was so that Bush jnr. could finish off what his dad had started.

Would 9/11 have happened if the rightful winner of the US Presidential election been declared the new President? Somehow I can't see Al Gore being demonized by islamic fanatics in the same way as first George Bush snr and now "Dubbya" have been.

Vote rigging by Jeb Bush in Florida on his brother's behalf cost the USA a great deal more than even such a simpleton as he could ever have imagined!