Page 3 of 4
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 6:25 pm
by steve56
is it true he was related to the queen?
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 6:41 pm
by mart
Who are you referring to steve56?
Conan the Barbarian or Arnie?
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 6:41 pm
by steve56
arthur.
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 6:58 pm
by Deuce Bigolo
You are right it is a fascinating story and probably more so because there still remains that sense of mystery of Arthur
My curiosity stems purely from the fact as you say its the least recorded
period of history and having just read a fictional series by Stephen Lawhead
(I know an American) wanted to see what the real story was
Given that Writers are only what they learn & experience
I'd say theres a good chance many books wouldn't have seen the light of day and even if they had their format & characters would most likely have been different
The Epic Fantasy-Fictional Book will be around forever in a day IMHO
and the use of traits like of chivalry & honor will keep them coming back for more possibly because they don't seem exist in the here & now
People love to escape from the daily grind
cheers
B....OZ
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 9:15 pm
by Peter
The true King Arthur is of course Mr Scargill, who led his gallant army in the last civil war, culminating in the Battle of Orgreave.
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:03 pm
by Pervert
I didn't know there'd been a queen called Arthur.
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:00 am
by The Ed – Club International
But just how much ham, jam and spam did he really eat?
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 7:12 am
by Deuce Bigolo
I thought Dudley always went by the alias Vanessa
or was that Peter Cook?
The Plot thickens
cheers
B....OZ
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 2:06 pm
by Pervert
Not too much---he had to push a pram a lot.
Re: King Arthur
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:20 pm
by Wink Wink
But the burning question is...........did he ruin his cakes!!!