Page 3 of 5
Re: EmiliaAnn
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:41 pm
by pooleguy
Sonya.
Re: EmiliaAnn
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:29 am
by LickHerLovely
So when you decide to re distribute my content should I be requesting royalty fees from your sales?
Re: EmiliaAnn
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:37 am
by funboy
Tapioca Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Same tat on ankle tells me otherwise!
But EmiliaAnn does not have a tattoo on her finger or back of hand, it?s not her
Re: EmiliaAnn
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:39 am
by funboy
TC99 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> And the Very Obvious Unique Nipples , its her
While I agree that EmiliaAnn has very distinctive nipples, she does not have a tattoo on her finger or on the back of her hand, I?m sorry but it isn?t her
Re: EmiliaAnn
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:41 am
by funboy
LickHerLovely Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> So when you decide to re distribute my content
> should I be requesting royalty fees from your
> sales?
As owner of the OF and the shooter if the content perhaps you could confirm that ?Sonya? is not EmiliaAnn
Re: EmiliaAnn
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:03 pm
by LickHerLovely
funboy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> LickHerLovely Wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------
> > So when you decide to re distribute my content
> > should I be requesting royalty fees from your
> > sales?
>
>
> As owner of the OF and the shooter if the content
> perhaps you could confirm that ?Sonya? is not
> EmiliaAnn
It is my duty to only every refer to any model/performer by what she states on her release form, and only that so no comment will be made. It would be idiotic of me to start giving away any masked models real identity in an open forum.
I do not however, aprreciate the idea that some may purchase content from me in order to redistribute it themselves, especially for money
Re: EmiliaAnn and the coming apocalypse
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:15 pm
by TMS
LickHerLovely raises a continuing problem.
If photographers pay models to shoot session material for sale, then viewers start swapping or selling the material cheap, the original photographers are no longer supported in shooting anything new.
So people who swap or re-sell material shoot themselves in the foot, in that eventually no-one will be shooting anything new for them to watch. But by the time that happens, shooting will have long before ground to a halt.
The lesson is - if you want to see continuing material of new models, support the photographers who shoot it, don't swap or re-sell their material.
This message probably come too late though. Already most models would prefer to stay at home on webcam, partly because photographers can't raise enough paid interest in shooting them.
Re: Amber Green and Chloe Sas
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:09 pm
by Ashton_Casey
Top burny busty chicks only on this site! Follow the link, and you won?t be sorry! - https://bit.ly/3qJZS9X [img]
https://img.prikolin.ru/uploads/posts/2 ... ot/506.jpg[/img]
Re: Amber Green and Chloe Sas
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:09 pm
by Ashton_Casey
Top burny busty chicks only on this site! Follow the link, and you won?t be sorry! - https://bit.ly/3qJZS9X [img]
https://img.prikolin.ru/uploads/posts/2 ... ot/506.jpg[/img]
Re: Amber Green and Chloe Sas
Posted: Mon Jul 12, 2021 8:09 pm
by Ashton_Casey
Top burny busty chicks only on this site! Follow the link, and you won?t be sorry! - https://bit.ly/3qJZS9X [img]
https://img.prikolin.ru/uploads/posts/2 ... ot/506.jpg[/img]