Page 3 of 4

Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 4:53 pm
by Bicycle Bum
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. These girls are not facing poverty if they refuse to do ATM, and they are not making money to provide for their old silver haired mothers either. They are just greedy bitches without class or dignity and no producer is bending their arms either.

Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Wed May 22, 2013 8:31 pm
by one eyed jack
I think a girl who engages in a2m without cleaning her botty before has no self respect !laugh!

I'm not sure why you think these girls do not deserve to have a relationship BB. Its just porn. Who are you to judge them?

This is what I mean when i say girls dont have a problem doing porn. Its opinions like yours that cast aspersions on them designed to make them feel bad

Girls don't need to be porn stars to do these things. I know plenty girls who arent porn stars that indulge in watersports, a2m, dp's, threesomes, cheating, swinging the lot...and many of them are in relationships and have kids. Most dont een get regular check ups. proof is in the statistics with the rise of std's across the board.

The real world is frankly a lot worse than porn. One only has to check the latest celebrity being hauled in for fiddling with kids to start off with. Next up the kiddy killers, dodgy men of the cloth in churches

There are far worse things in the world than a girl sucking a cock from her arse. Just dont kiss her after if you feel that bad about it !happy!


Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 5:32 am
by Bicycle Bum
At least we agree there is a line that shouldn't be crossed and child porn crosses that line by a wide margin. I also happen to think that bestiality crosses the line as does self-inflicted injuries such as hammering nails into your own dick. I don't think it's a simple matter to define that line by what is legal and consensual. There ought to be other criteria. Some porn is in very very bad taste, no pun intended. Bodil crossed the line. What she did wasn't illegal where she did it and she consented, but she paid the price for it. Her sad lonely demise might be seen as a form of natural justice. Some girls with a gutter mouth history can only realistically do a roundhouse turn by employing forgetfulness or ignorance, to attract some bloke who isn't aware she was once a notorious gutter mouth. Of course Natasha Marley is no gutter mouth but she did fuck Paul Chaplin, in effect dancing with the devil in the pale moonlight. So, she will be forever eternally condemned.

Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 6:56 am
by one eyed jack
Whoa BB, I dont think thats fair to go that far about Paul. I mean, where shall we draw the line on this? She did nice wel produced porn. She didnt do a2m...I'm sure she didnt do any back alley Sally stuff either but thats neither here nor there

She is still a woman who had sex with a man and that in itself is not disgusting at all. Ok its not your bag but surely its all about seeing the girl and not the bloke doing it?

Fair play to him, he put the money in and I bet she was outside the usual prices. If that was me I wouldve passed the duties onto a top quality stud because I'm all about seeing the thrill on a womans face than the dick in her pussy.

Not that I wouldnt mind having a go myself which in this case he did and some will say they dont blame him but I wouldnt go as far as to say she blotted her card by shagging him at all

Im just saying, what difference does it make? Did just doing porn bring her down in the eyes of her fans? I think so merely because there are some models that are put on a pedestal that their fans do not want to see her touched by anyones penis. Not even their own

Watch how nasty some get the moment when certain girls cross over to b/g. You'd think they had ownership on that woman. its quite disturbing to think that beyond a wank some men are that clingy about a woman they would never have a chance to even know in their lives


Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 7:49 am
by Bicycle Bum
I didn't even know who Natasha Marley was until she done hardcore. I'm not a Sun reader. Prefer the Guardian myself. I was joking about the devil thing. She's maybe to be compared to a Geisha in that she resists giving in until she gets the best offer she's ever likely to get. I hope she got at least 100,000 for her time with Chaplin, and he's probably moronic enough to pay.

Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Thu May 23, 2013 8:13 am
by one eyed jack
I think she was more the Loaded/ FHM lads mags/ glamour model

I wouldnt know about The Sun


Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 1:36 pm
by rgb
A nice ad-lib in one of the Chaplin/Natasha scenes. He nearly goes into the wrong hole and she says: "No! that's my arse. I'm saving that for a rainy day"
!laugh!


Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Sat May 25, 2013 2:33 pm
by planeterotica
rgb wrote:

> A nice ad-lib in one of the Chaplin/Natasha scenes. He nearly
> goes into the wrong hole and she says: "No! that's my arse.
> I'm saving that for a rainy day"
> !laugh!
>
planeterotica wrote:

That was always my advice to new girls coming into the industry, save the tradesman's entrance for later when the work starts to dry up !wink!


Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 11:33 am
by Tequila_Woods
Well isn't BB a judgmental cunt... it's no wonder barely any of the female talent bother to frequent this forum nowadays *rolleyes*


Re: Question for female talent

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:20 pm
by Bicycle Bum
Say what you like, but I'm not against girls doing porn or girls selling sex, but some girls are as filthy as fuck. Dirty disgusting disease spreading bitches. Any girl who does ATM is a fucking lunatic and should keep away from as many people as possible.