Page 3 of 4

Angel Long behind the scenes...

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 6:50 pm
by max_tranmere

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:52 pm
by rebelrebel
I have been through this thread and it seems to me that some posters think they ?own? Angel Long. It is as if she should have got their permission before having things done. Also, some of those posters claim to be genuine fans ? really? What genuine Angel fan would criticise her publicly on a forum in this manner? A genuine fan, even if he didn?t like what she has had done would have kept his mouth shut. It also puts her in the invidious position to have to come on the forum and talk about what she has done. If it had been me I would just posted ?**** off, none of your business? but then she has more class than me and is much more even tempered. Only one thing matters here ? not whether she is less hot or hotter after the changes but what it means to her and as we have seen she is good with it.

On the thread more generally, the nasty little post about Lolly Badcock beggars belief! what possible purpose does it serve slagging her off in this way? Does the author not realise that actually, porn stars are just normal people doing a job and like all normal people, have feelings too?

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 5:10 pm
by jamesr
What a load of boll*cks from Rebelrebel. Angel has made her fortune and her choice from this industry. Thousands of fans have pawed over her work and she has always pushed the boundries and her work has been at the forefront of contemporary porn. If however, 'fans' (how dare you try and constitute what a fan is, like they need to qualify for the title) decide to make comment that they dislike her current look then such comments need to be accepted, not derided. Yes, 'each to their own' and Angel knows perfectly well that such comments simply go to prove that she is still being watched, rather than ignored.


Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:02 pm
by rebelrebel
Eh! such comments have to be accepted - no they don't, they can be looked and ignored if the person chooses to.

As for 'don't you dare' - I bloody well dare what I want to dare mate and all I know is this, if you asked 100 people, is a genuine fan someone that criticises someone publicly rather than sending that person an email privately? 100 people would say no. Do you really think anyone finds public criticism helpful or constructive and that anyone that goes in for this, can in any way be construed a fan when the option is there to say what you have to say privately?

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:03 pm
by thealtruist
Rebelrebel:

Porn stars make their money from the likes of me and you. If I don't like what they've done then I'll say so, so you can fuck off!

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:09 pm
by derrick76
rebelrebel doesn't understand the concept of the fan and the star. Asking if he knows why some stars 'fade away'.

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:54 pm
by one eyed jack
Angels decision to alter her looks in the way she wants is as rock n roll as her decision to get into it in the first place.

The porn biz is a haven to rebellion

She might lose a few fans sure...But she can still gain new ones.


Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Sat Feb 04, 2012 5:01 am
by rebelrebel
So can you mate!

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 12:04 pm
by dogfishpen
Where can i see what she looks like now?

Re: Angel Long :(

Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:02 pm
by thealtruist
I saw her pics on Twitter. I'm sure if you Google her you could find them. Maybe try Freeones.