Page 3 of 3
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 10:45 am
by Matt2003
How about getting Jess West, Danny D and Jessica Pressley together for a Real Couples shoot. now that WOULD be amazing !!
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:49 pm
by one eyed jack
Thanks for that William. I always try to look for interesting aspects to keep the theme fresh and interesting and I find that every couple brings something about themselves into the mix and it becomes interesting beyond the sex itself.
If it was just about shagging it would only be half interesting and I doubt we would have the following we are still lucky to have
Jess West and Danny D are on my list. Its just a question of when. The longer they are together the better. Makes the chat more interesting
I wouldnt mind Jessica Presley being in on the action but I always stipulate on getting the couple by themselves first and ....Does Jessica actually do bg outside of hj and bj???
This could work too....
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:21 pm
by RoddersUK
I find behind the scenes very interesting, makes the shoot a more natural thing, methinks.
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 3:58 pm
by one eyed jack
Thanks Rodders. I was a bit worried some people wouldnt get it and confuse it as a regular update so was a bit of a risk.
So far its been viewed in favourable light but the poll we put up was a bit mixed with the majority in favour of the bonus stuff
The BTS stuff really shows the couple for what they are
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:49 pm
by rexwantinsex
Katie K won't do B/G because she's clearly got either a long-term partner, or going off her Twitter pics, I'm guessing she's engaged given the positioning of a ring in certain photos
Which is a massive shame, because she could earn quite a bit of money if she were to do a few exclusive B/G scenes
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:53 pm
by one eyed jack
I think its fair we'd all like to see Katie K getting jiggy widdit but the decision to do so is a highly personal one that you cant just merely put down to money.
I'm sure she knows she would get good money and believe me...I've asked !happy!
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 5:05 am
by rexwantinsex
don't get me wrong here, I agree that B/G is a personal decision for the model alone, it's just I guess a few guys (myself included) would be more than willing to shell out a few quid to watch her (possibly including her partner) doing what most guys want to do - fuck Katie K! LOL
but I do agree that it is purely personal choice on the model's part and if she's not comfortable doing so, or just has no interest in a boy/girl scene, then that's for Katie to make alone
Re: RealCouples..primary targets for 2012
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:51 am
by one eyed jack
Also have to bear in mind that some lovers may be the best for their girl off camera but when it gets in front of one is another story entirely.
Half the time the real turn on is doing the video because it adds a frisson of mischief but if a guy dreads being seen on camera it can be a nightmare. There is a very good example of this on Real Couples where i was sweating buillet the guy wasnt going to break down in tears for how nervous he was. If he struggled to get it up I wouldve called time on the shoot as it s supposed to be fun, not a task
I could cite a few examples where fans around here were happy to see some of their fave girls getting rogered but disappointed in the effort because the girls did it for money and the chemistry just wasn't there.
I admit it is hugely challenging to get first timers confidence, especially the bloke as you hope he turns in a performance that puts that twinkle in his girls eye