Page 3 of 4
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 2:48 pm
by jimslip
You said, "This is why models like Abi Toyne last the course.........and many of Viv Thomas' girls...."
Most of Viv Thomas's girls (As far as I am aware) are from Eastern Europe as are ours. Most girls from this part of the world are tat free, fresh faced, beautiful and most importantly, reliable and professional.
That's why they dominate the mainstream porn industry. They see porn as a proper job, not as a "Lark" to drop in and out of whenever they need some extra cash.!happy!
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:01 pm
by MISTER C
Three words for a lot of todays porn girls!
...Snog..Marry..Avoid! (a trashy TV show they should all watch!)
Why there's the need to look like a council-house slag I don't know. This is probably why I'm a tad nostalgic in my preference of pornstars as well.
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:20 am
by videokim
The term council house slags is not a nice one, in this industry you should understand people more, We shoot posh people to people living in council houses & they all the same once the clothes come off.
Its no wonders glossy shoots are losing the battle to amateur with people of your opions...try to be a bit more professional.
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 9:26 am
by one eyed jack
Posh pussy. Common pussy. As long as its clean pussy...Its aaaaallll good.
Everyone is entitled to their preference but maybe "council house slag" was a bit harsh eh Mister C (even though you genuinely meant it)
Lets be honest, the difference between one production and another scrubbing em up a bit makes a huge difference and lets not forget that alot of the girls that come into porn (and some of the best) havent exactly come from posh middle class backgrounds.
The sad fact of the matter is that a lot of girls have no real idea to glma up due to environmental influences...Remmeber that classy fashion mode called Gia in the 80's, proper "street trash", glam her up: Goddess
Thing is, she was spotted for her talent looking the way she was
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 3:17 pm
by Anna Joy
Ive watched that program, its the girls plastered in make-up with fake tits and hair they want to avoid and the natural looking girls they want to snog and marry, so i dont know what kind of point your trying to make and the council house slag comment, if thats intended for me you dont even know me to make that jugment lol. I dont live in a council house nor did i come from one and if i did i wouldnt be ashamed anyway! =0)
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 4:21 pm
by Anna Joy
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 6:52 pm
by sparky
The way I read this the reference is ' looking like a council house slag ' NOT implying that they are one, although to anyone who did not know otherwise out on the street the person fits this mould.
Similarly asking a model to dress and act like a slut or a chav is very different to implying that they are one.
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2011 7:27 pm
by Anna Joy
well i dont look like 1 either so there u go!!!!!!
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:26 am
by MISTER C
The comment wasn't aimed at you Anna, I was in fact replying to BigGuy's original post about preferences to pornstars' appearance in films.
So I used the words 'council-house'.....maybe as to not upset people I should've used the shortened, more acceptable acronym 'chav'.
Still derogatory, but somehow more acceptable.....
Sparky understood what I meant - 'looking like' a chav. Whether it's implied or not.
Anyway, I'm no to wasting any more time on this silly post - I'm off. Happy Easter too !thumbsup!
Re: Just a porn watchers point of view
Posted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 3:58 am
by MISTER C
...dig....dig !wink!