Page 3 of 9
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:40 pm
by Mr Humpy
Even in this time of world recession, I understand that there are still positions available in the mailbag sewing industry for experienced seamstresses !!!
Bit of a sad story really !sad!
H
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:41 am
by planeterotica
Here are some clips of Melissa in action and lets hope she does make a comeback into porn on her release.
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:15 am
by countb
What a fine reply Kyle.
You summed it up precisely.Thanks for that.
DS
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 6:11 am
by one eyed jack
Just because I worked with Melissa several times doesnt really mean i know her but the Melissa I remembered was a kind, fun loving girl who had a good sense of humour.
If I had to suggest, then I would say she simply got hooked up with an asshole boyfriend who like many others was charming and appealing whe they got together until the proverbial shit kicked off and brought the worst out in both in a sudden moment of fury where both just didnt think of the consequences.
If the boyfriend is abusive to women then he will get his one way or another one day. Prison, injury or worse. Those types always do unless he rights himself through anger management or finds god or whatever
One things for sure, he cant be a very happy person inside if he is that kind of guy.
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:20 am
by countb
ANOTHER TOP REPLY OEJ.
I dont normally get embroiled in justice but this case has been a farce against Melissa.The doubling of her sentence by Baroness Scotland was to prove a point against the industry IMO.
Just hope MEL comes out without any bitterness but wouldnt blame her if she did.Maybe if she had got a better brief,she would have been advised not to appeal.But then she has always protested her innocence against it being premeditated.
Fuck the legal system ,it stinks unless you are a premiere league footballer ???Then you walk no matter what.....
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:10 am
by JamesW
"CAUSE SHES GOOD AT IT AND PRETTY TOO(EXCUSE CAPS)"
She said she had retired from porn before the unfortunate incident which led to her being jailed, so I don't see it as obvious that she would go back to porn after she's released from prison.
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:31 am
by Kyle Richmond
Don't think she was doing porn when this incident occured but I am sure she was doing that other type of work we're not allowed to mention on here, after all the reports in the argus said she had a ?1000 per week cocaine habit. Just looked at the articles from 2 yrs ago, to update my first post the original sentence was 2 and a half years, increased to 4 yrs 9 mths in sept 07 due to one baroness scotland.Did she appeal, I assume it would have been after the increase if she did, think she did but no joy and not appealing again.It looks like she may have to do the full stretch.
university eduacated, seemingly from a well off family background and with aspirations to work with disabled/underpriviledged kids the reports said, how did she end up in porn and what were her first films? think she started around 2000?
All this prison talk reminds me of the old adult channel show , was it "banged up". Whatever happened to Chloe who did this and various shows on TAC?
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:19 pm
by countb
Kyle she did not appeal about the doubling of the sentence.Maybe she was advised not to risk it being increased again.
I just think if she had engaged Mike Mansfield QC,she would have got off.
Must say,on a lighter note,she looks adorable with her hair darker.
I would offer her a job a my PA ..theres just something so appealing about her .
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:32 pm
by jj
It's also partly the 'bad boy' thing, i suspect.
Alas, female [and male, for that matter] sexual desire has little
to do with common-sense or self-preservation......
Re: melissa walker
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:36 pm
by jj
countb wrote:
> fair point but her partner had a history of violence towards
> his girlfriends.
History isn't usually revealed until after the trial- unless the
defence raises it first.
> Her doubling of the sentence was IMO just to make an example of
> her.She was no angel but neither was the bloke.
Vindictive and unfair. Her brief should have challenged.
> MY BET IS SHE WILL RETURN TO PORN WHEN SHES RELEASED.
No chance- who'd employ her? Her body's already partially-wrecked
by that terrible boob-job. Sorry to be so brutal, but....