egafd.com

@ warren zevon rip, who posted:

"As far as anyone can tell, Max does not do anything illegal, however disquieting his work is. Any suggestion that he is doing things that are illegal could be the end of this website, as that would have to be defended in a court of law, which requires stronger proof than hearsay and personal opinion"



- why do you lawys start on about courts of law and hersay etc every time max hardcore comes up on this site? you aren't a lawyer or legally trained so you really don't know what you are talking about. we've had this coversation before. (GGG thread)

In the event that the operators of this site were to officially adopt such a viewpointand present it as fact, there may be the beginnings of a case. But in a forum-type setting such as this, where all posts are clearly a matter of the author's personal opinion, there is nothing that would substantiate a legal action.

So, stop posting up your half-baked legalities in an effort to make your views appear more authoritative than they actually are.

and yes, if you like watching girlsed dressed as pre-teens pretending to be pre-teens and vocalising the same, you probably are at least a latent paedophile, if not full blown.

Your remarks in the last sentence of your post were unacceptable, hence it's removal.

It's not simply a question of the performers' response to him. They're paid to do all kinds of things that they don't necessarily enjoy. That's a given with porn. It's a question of HOW he portrays them. Essentially he encourages viewers to view the performers as under-age girls and then proceeds to treat them like shit, making them look as ugly as possible - streaming mascara, smeared make-up etc - basically to dehumanise them.

I don't give a fuck about what Max Hardcore is like as a person. His screen-persona celebrates a repugnant attitude to women.

The lamest argument in the world is 'don't like it, don't watch it'. Using that rationale, anything is acceptable, when patently it isn't. I'm fairly certain you wouldn't advocate that approach to paedophilia for example.

What if there were a female performer who adopted the MH style - would there be the same outcry as we have witnessed here and on other threads?

I have no problem with that.

The Brutal Truth wrote:

> Like the AGA stuff you mean? Women debasing women is fine.

Is there really any difference between those who get off on degrading women and those who pander to those who get off on seeing women degraded? It's porn's equivalent of the Taliban----men worried that women are becoming too powerful and need put back in their place.

I gotta chuck in my bit here. Max (I dont know him personally) but I know those mentioned who have worked with him and others of his ilk (Khan Tusion etc). For a while I've heard about all this extreme stuff and blokes hating those producers for it but the reality is, those same guys have produced that material specifically to outrage.

Sure they might have taken the piss here and there as I know something about Max on good faith with a model that was quite able to match his wily ways above and beyond the call of duty but took umbrage with something that he assumed she would have been ok with but wasnt.

If those guys were really that bad they wouldve been locked up or shot by some angry boyfriend/ brother or father by now.

The fact its rtattled some peoples cage here proves that it works. For some they need to look at it again to drink in what they think they saw the first time. Shock porn is goingto be with us for a long time as it is the only way for the bad boys to stand out from the rest. Whether these individuals are women hating perverts or just highly sexed geniuses is blurred by a very thin line.

The bottom line depends on whether you the buying public like it or not. If porn can be compared to drugs, the tamer end can be seen as mogodons and the extreme end as an adrenaline fix. Like it or not it gets everyone going by outraging or exciting.