Re: not anal
Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 10:24 am
If you read my post, you'll see I call anal an "Industry requirement", it's not my bag as it happens, but the "Dictators" of porn demand it. You would not believe the number of girls who are unable to do anal, because they have recently been banged into by some clumsy oaf in a previous scene, which was the case in the Avalon scene.
In a Jimslip scene you'll see everything, I don't cut and give you the "Good bits", I've always thought the "trying" is more erotic than the actual act itself.
Please remember in many anal scenes, you wont see the bit where the girl has been coerced, bullied or tricked into performing anal. You see a sanitised version.
The Yanks of course relish the whole anal bullying thing and will incorporate it into their films with gusto.
None of this is to deny that many girls actually enjoy anal.
Anyway my main point is that if this "Need" for anal starts to diminish, it will be good!
In a Jimslip scene you'll see everything, I don't cut and give you the "Good bits", I've always thought the "trying" is more erotic than the actual act itself.
Please remember in many anal scenes, you wont see the bit where the girl has been coerced, bullied or tricked into performing anal. You see a sanitised version.
The Yanks of course relish the whole anal bullying thing and will incorporate it into their films with gusto.
None of this is to deny that many girls actually enjoy anal.
Anyway my main point is that if this "Need" for anal starts to diminish, it will be good!