egafd.com

Trumpton wrote:

> I'm stunned by the sheer number of dimwits who believe all the
> propaganda from these channels, and then complain when they are
> conned time and time again.
>
> If you're in any doubt DO NOT SUBSCRIBE!!!
>
>
I'm assuming you're referring to my post when you say "dimwits". Luckily, I'm far from dim witted, and am aware the claims in the pre-encryption show are to be taken with a pinch of salt. I've paid my 5.99 in the past to see what it gets, and this time was fully aware I'd get a lot less than the channels on my motorised satellite system. However, I was curious as to how they'd handle a boy/girl situation without showing anything outside guidelines.

My post was to highlight that the boy/girl combo didn't appear at all post encryption, and to act as a warning to others. Hopefully it helped some other posters here who were curious as well.

It would be a pretty boring world if people didn't do something just because they had some doubts.

No Sir, I was not referring to anyone in particular! My comments were just my general observations on this situation.

I'll offer you this; if we wish to improve the current state of British porn, then I would suggest that people DO NOT SUBSCRIBE these rip-off channels!

I am aware of the length of the subscriptions to these channels. My point is that you would be better off not subscribing, irrespective of the time period!

hi this post just keeps going on and on, for one thing and you all know this as well as me we are not aloud to show you our pussys no more if we could w would as for the matter on where we are doing stuff for realy or not would you rather sit there and not do it than get fucked? no then nor do we boy girl is rel but again we cant show you erect cock!! dont go on and on about us girls being shit most of us do god dam hard core any way so why fake it as said by some one before if you dont like it dont watch it,
i love my job and love all the girls on the show some time yes we do have a five min chat but belive it or not some people like to know about us and what we have been up to, if you want hard core go by a dvd or down load until the out dated uk laws let us do our jod freely on live tv.

Yes Amber, we all know, now, thanks to people coming on here and telling us. Its not like anyone at Sport came out and told us is it? You don't hear the models on any of these channels saying things like "After encryption, it won't get any harder at all" do you.

The two main complaints have always been the lack of honesty on the part of all these channels, and the lack of willingness to actually stand up and take Ofcom on. After all, we are all bound by the European TWF treaty, and most of the other countries in Europe don't have any problem showing hardcore, in some cases without pin protection.

All Ofcom have produced is a code, which could be challenged on the grounds that the strict level of censorship outlined in the code is both unnecessary and breaches the TWF treaty. However, no adult channel appears to want to do that, instead they would rather continue raking in cash from people by hinting, suggesting and in some cases promising that things are truly hardcore if you pay your money. For instance, at least up til last week and probably still, SportXXX had a message on screen up to 10 o'clock saying "Just ?5.99 for hardcore action after encryption". Do you think that the encrypted action has been "hardcore" in any way recently?

Well put Grawth,thats why this channel is such a liar,but people will soon realise this
do as playboy does and not advertise that they r hard if u become a member
who does want to pay ?5.99 for three hours of soft stuff and the movies r so old and repeated every night,

who is getting all this cash? cause the girls cant get paid that much for three hours work

SportThisIsNotXXXBabes

dancebitch wrote:

> who is getting all this cash?

The born-agian Christian major shareholder, that's who. I'll give you a clue - he doesn't like Dickie Branson at the moment.