Page 3 of 8
Re: why is uk porn so poor?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 7:03 pm
by mart
Has one of Heathray's posts been deleted? I can't see him referring to anyone by name.
Mart
Re: UK porn
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 7:04 pm
by redrussian
Can't beleive that some of you guys like that american crap, honestly, Half the directors and producers think there making mainstream movies these days rather than porn.
It takes 20 or so minutes in some yank films before you even get to the fucking, what with all the shitty scripts and everything, yaaaaaaaaawwwwnnnnn!!!!. Nahhh, give me good old fashioned british shagging with a bird you might expect to find in your local on any given sunday afternoon, rather than blown up porn stars wwho all look the same anyways. well done Marino, Ben, Jack and the rest. quality stuff!
Re: why is uk porn so poor?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 9:00 pm
by woodgnome
as you've been in the industry for over 20 years, perhaps you could tell us?
Re: UK porn
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 9:03 pm
by one eyed jack
So there you have it. British porn aint all that bad and so long as it does as it says on the box, all the better for it. I don't blame Marino for his rash outburst nor anyone else who works hard at this game. Its hard enough trying to make a good film when people like Heathray come round and trash your work, even professional existence by making sweeping comments such as "shit" then slinks back into the darkness of the shadows to watch the drama unfold.
Heathray, you are pathetic. I'd respect your opinion if you were constructive with it. You sound like a weedy little trouble maker and you deserve the derisive coments made about you here. You're probably giggling your little arse off like a schoolgirl doing it too.
I'm pleased though Officer Dibble didnt join in though. We've been round this subject so many times its just far-kin boooo-rring. I'm sure the good Officer thinks the same.
Really people, has things been that boring where we have to create excitement by going over old ground. Move on.
Re: why is uk porn so poor?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 9:12 pm
by one eyed jack
Dave, you have mail.
Re: UK porn
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 11:32 pm
by Officer Dibble
"I'm pleased though Officer Dibble didn?t join in though"
Everyone knows my thoughts well enough by now, and I'd only get castigated by Deuce for going over same old ground, so I thought it best to let others have their say and put the case.
But the issue isn't boring, look again Tel. It's the liveliest thread on this page. Passions have been roused over the issue - contrast that with the inconsequential prattle in most other threads. There's nothing else of any real weight, substance, or importance, for serious debaters to get their choppers into. I see someone?s talking about having R18 on satellite TV - which seems to me to be the next most interesting thread. But you know what? A few years ago I'd have thought it was a really exiting prospect - but now I find I don't give a dam either way.
Officer Dibble
Re: why is uk porn so poor?
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 12:15 am
by Deuce Bigolo
All the answers are in the archive as this subject has been discussed UMPTEEN times before
One thing that does bother me if that while you were taking your free pot shots you forgot to mention what you consider ACCEPTABLE Porn.
Just an oversight or were you making yourself a small target?
cheers
B....OZ
Re: why is uk porn so poor?
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 6:29 am
by eroticartist
Here,here Joe.
Mike Freeeman
Re: why is uk porn so poor?
Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 6:41 am
by mart
One thing that strikes me Deuce is that any punter who has the temerity to criticize stands a good chance of being flamed if not deleted.
Quite right too, after all the punters are there to have their cash extracted.
Mart