Page 3 of 3
Re: is this the new Angel Long?
Posted: Mon Apr 25, 2005 4:34 pm
by Heathray
Elegance? My arse. Rough as a badgers posterior. Give us women with curves, not ones that look like stick insects.
Re: is this the new Angel Long?
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 5:18 pm
by tom_anderson
It's only natural she will be shy early on in her porn career. You have to remember that most girls in porm follow the progression topless only --> full nudity --> open legs --> g/g --> b/g with partner --> b/g full
This young girl did not go through the normal progression, she went for b/g full right from the start and I don't think she did too bad.
Although she did start the shoot looking and acting shy, but she soon lost her shyness as the minutes passed by and was soon giving it some dirty verbal sexual tones as the shoot progressed.
[img]
http://www.digicreationsxxx.com/image/nic_mason3.jpg[/img]
tom
http://www.digicreationsxxx.com
tom.anderson@digicreationsxxx.com
Re: Golly Friday AND Saturday !
Posted: Tue Apr 26, 2005 5:38 pm
by nachovx
Thanks for reminding me - I love Shredded Wheat ... I think I'll have some now. Nothing to do with the topic, but mmmm, you can't beat the basic cereals - Corn Flakes, Weetabix & Shredded Wheat. They know what they can do with those Cocoa Pops ....or did they
Re: Golly Friday AND Saturday !
Posted: Wed Apr 27, 2005 4:49 pm
by robo
She does not look all that to me. give me vicky powell any day full womanly curves.
Re: is this the new Angel Long?
Posted: Sat May 07, 2005 2:52 am
by craigjw
Yeah - great looking women but you cannot download from them,