Page 3 of 4

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 6:52 pm
by MJ
Great news guys!

After a good talk with the BBFC and some explenations,
they re-examined the movie and they cleared for R18!

So those BBFC people aren't that bad after all!

Cheers,

Martijn.

Pleasure Plaza

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:35 pm
by joe king
How and why?

How did the scenario suddenly change?
How does the BBFC 're-examine' a work? Do they reject it then you complain?
Did they reject it?


Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2004 9:55 pm
by Phil mCc
I had "making love with Diane" refused as well because she says schoolgirl in it so I shall be shaking the BBFC cage tommorow if they are in,

Phil McC


Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:26 pm
by Jock
It may have been released with an R18 certificate, but is it uncut? The runtimes given on the BBFC site fall short of those of the mainland European release:-

Disc 1 - 171m42s compared with 175m
Disc 2 - 29m33s compared with 60m

Also, although the BBFC say "This work was passed with no cuts made" they also say "Some cuts substituted"

What's going on? Was it pre-censored by the distributor to obtain an R18?

TIA.

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 5:40 am
by joe king
Have you cut the movie?


Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:56 am
by Easter Egg
We left out the intro movies of Disc 1 when submitting the tape to the BBFC. (stuff like company intro, warnings, Gufa).
That's the difference between 171m42s and 175m.
No cuts here.

About the bonus disc, there is a lot of footage (like trailers) that was already approved by the BBFC on previous releases. So we didn't need to submit that again. (and pay again for it).
That's the difference between 29m33s (submitted footage) and 60m. (all the bonus material)
No cuts here either...

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 7:58 am
by joe king
thanks


Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Mon Jan 03, 2005 8:57 am
by chuckstar

This country is such a joke when it comes to censorship..and all the goodies goodies who try and protect us. We can buy the bloody stuff abroad and get it in or watch it on the net...so why do they bother...infact if they didnt do it, we may leave the net alone and buy from shops! We know what were buying so ? Why dont they just put warnings on the labels instead and then we can decide if we dont want it.

Anyway...Angel is fab! I was lucky enough to work with her for Nectas Movies and she blew me away! She just keep the dirty talk going all the way through...I hardly got a word in...didnt help control the money shot , she was being that dirty verbally...I love it...but not when im trying to do a job LOL !!!!!!!!

I wonder if teh guys at BBFC take copies home for them selves....hmmmmm??? I bet its not the cencored versions they take home!!!

Chuck

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 11:26 am
by Stefan.
I have just received my copy, which I am am very disapointed with because its rubbish, but it HAS got all of the so called "cut" bits in it.
Are you sure you haven't bought the 18 version and not the R18.
Theres a film called "Pirates" the proper one is an R18, BUT the video shop has got the 18 version for hire.

Re: Virtual Sex With Angel Long

Posted: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:08 pm
by Stefan.
I'll tell you why I think its rubbish.

Its very "acted" and in a patronising way, with a non stop barrage of filthy talk which gets very tedious.
She talks and acts in an Overly seducted manner which does the opposite of what it should because its so over the top and so obviously put on.

I was very unimpressed with the interview.
I was expecting a decent interview where she would talk genuinely about her work just like if a real acted was interviewed, and I was hoping to see what she had to say and what she was really like.
Instead of that what there is, is a short section of her in the bath ACTING a load of completely over the top filth talk complete with exaggerated facial expressions, and just a sort of small soft porn thing, instead of the interview that I wanted to see.
The other bous stuff did't warrant the extra disc either really.
No cum shots, I was waiting to see her ejaculate, and no male cum shots really.
I put my beast away in the end.