Page 3 of 3

Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 12:38 pm
by emmab
Ya my punk rock butthole surfers tattoo makes me chavy!! NOT
hello
chavs are stearotypical essex girls blonde big gold earrings chinese symbol tattoos who go to raves...
Im not a chav i am into punk rock and grunge and i think you are mistaking what a chav is... I've had to live with chavs for 20years and im certainly NOT a chav and having a tattoo you design or from a punk rock band (i got it because i travelled to texas alone when i was 18.. twice and i for a cool memory type reason)
CHAVS get chinese symbols 'that mean love innit' or dragons up their arms (men)


Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:03 pm
by Zorro
A lot of women in the industry have tattoos to be recognised. More often than not in a group sex scene there are bodies everywhere and only bits are seen, so to make sure you know who is fucking like a legend when their face is not visible the get a distinctive tattoo.

Obviously they want one too, and don't just have one for the above reason.


Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 5:28 pm
by Officer Dibble
"More often than not in a group sex scene there are bodies everywhere and only bits are seen"

Which brings me on to another point. Group sex scenes - what?s all that about? Is it a contemporary producer's way of trying to disguise the fact that there's nothing remotely imaginative or erotic about their movie? Could it be a way of disguising the fact that it doesn?t feature any 'stars' with even a modicum of box office pull? Is it their unsophisticated, unenlightened, way of trying to satisfy the punters? - Can't think of a good script/scenario? Can't get any appealing or attractive performers? No problem. Just show loads of naked writhing flesh in close up, a few gapping asses and fannys, plenty of anal, a touch of spitting and then you can simply say that your movie has got ?bucket loads of 'sex' in it?. Should satisfy those unsophisticated, dumbass, suckers, the punters, hey? After all, that's all they know/care about?

Don't know about you, but I find group sex scenes about as thrilling, satisfying and relevant as a damp weekend in Wigan. When I look for a movie I look for one featuring my favourite golden age porno ladies - say, Desire Cousteau, Victoria Paris, Tracy Adams etc, I expect to find her in a realistic 1 to 1 scenario with one of the studs of the era. I want to see her. I want to see she's wearing, I want to feel the build up of tension between the protagonists when they realise that sex is in the offing. I want to see the lady being disrobed, or even partially disrobed. I want to see how she reacts to the advances of the stud (feedback by proxy) maybe at first teasing him, toying with him and hopefully feel a little of the exitment of a real sexual encounter. Now, what I mean by a realistic scenario is, say, the boss shagging his secretary in the office, after everyone has gone home. That kind of thing happens, it could happen to you. It's a realistic proposition, you can identify with it. This makes it exciting.

Some might say ?Ah yes, that?s all very well, but porno gives people the opportunity to explore all the way-out stuff that they can only dream about ? like group sex and gapping asses, for instance.? Only thing is, that stuff hardly ever happens anywhere in real life, and hardly anybody in the real world actually dreams about that it ? it?s just a fallacy left over from the 70?s, combined with a blinkered desire amongst producers to keep up with the Jones ? ?If he?s puttin? 20 gaping anal group sex scenes and a bukkake, cream pie, finale in his movie, then I?ve got to put 30 gapping annals in, double cream pies, and an ass-to mouth finale?! Whether any of this unerotic, superfluous, shit actually appeals to real punters on the street never, ever, crosses their minds. Punters are simply taken for granted. Indeed in many instances, though they don't realise it, they're not making it for the punters.


Officer Dibble

Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 8:34 pm
by camdenman
I agree with vila, times and fashion change. When i was younger in the 80's it was very very rare to see girls with any tattoos and only so called bad girls had them.

I have always loved them from discovering a g/f having them. which was a complete surprise (lovely one at that).

now days they are to a penny and you can see everything. I still prefer the discrete ones on bum, lower back or thigh. but hey thats my odd tastes.


If girls want more fair play and if some guys don't like it then thats why the porno biz has exploded in to different tastes and sectors. Even s&m and swinging has come out so to speak.

everybody has got different tastes.


regards


Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 8:42 pm
by fevrd
Oh. I vaguely thought that it was so when she was being fucked doggy and her face wasn't visible everyone would still know who it was.

So that's just a lucky side-effect then.

fevrd

Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 9:17 pm
by Phil mCc
Get off the fence Dibbs, do you like tat's yes or no. Have you seen my new movie,

Jim.


Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:21 pm
by Officer Dibble
"Get off the fence Dibbs, do you like tat's yes or no"

Ha ha. The old Glasgow humour, irrepressible as ever, hey Phil? No, I haven?t seen it (the new film). Will I dig it? What's it called? Is it different to all the other current UK stuff? I haven?t been able to sit through a contemporary British porn film since the year 2000.

Funnily enough I've just been reediting some of the old F. T. stuff with the power of Final Cut Pro - it makes short work of those in-truck colour casts I can tell yer. Remember the time you and Jock parked the 'Fuck Truck' in my yard and we spent all day and half the night transferring the Beta cam rushes to DV, fuelled by coffee and pizza and a surprise visit from Amanda Pickering. Ah, those were the days...

Officer Dibble

Re: Tattoos

Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 11:42 pm
by Phil mCc
Footballers rude lives, you will like it but it does not have any dragging or gagging in it so it won't sell. Strait forward pretty girls made up nice shagging.
I heard yesterday Sony's new DV camera is Gonzo friendly it is like a swiss army knife complete with lump hammers and 9 inch blades to use instead of chat-up lines. I saw a site yesterday that summed up the way its all going real wifes raped at gunpoint, apparantly on the interactive DVD you get to choose which weapon and where to strike her. It is like "Extreme Hard Core Cluedo" off to bed to wank over memories of Sally White (Prize for a picture of her)

Phil McC


Re: Tattoos

Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:51 am
by Deuce Bigolo
How many Covers have girls with tattoos on them

Even Girls with huge tattoos ala Janine Lindemulder invariably have the shot taken from an angle to cover the fact up

Then consider the Performers from Eastern Europe

10 years ago you'd be lucky to find one with a tattoo but now as they've started migrating to the west quite a few have for what ever reasons added some of these Visually unhelpful accessories

Says to me its a Western Cultural thing

I come from the old school that much prefer accessories to come in the Lingerie/Clothing department

Now they add Appeal IMO...infact I'm just looking at a cover of
Butt Banging Nurses featruing Sabrina Johnson in White Lingerie...GRRRRRR!!!!!!

cheers
B....OZ Each to his Own