egafd.com

@OEJ" Wrote "Im not one of those who believes everything the BBC tells me even though they have a respectable but flawed and questionable history themselves with regards recent events"

You seem to have assumed because I said BBC, I meant BBC News, No I didnt.

@ OEJ "Jimmy Saville and the Mark Duggan shooting. That documentary using actors and the police as themselves in their words was a travesty of documentary film making compared to their usual high standards"

I was referring to the IPlayer that uses Bitorrent a internal delivery and DRM although they may use the actual Iplay app as the verification.

I am ending my input on these forums, I thank all of those who have contributed, but feel now that some of the important questions are willfully being ignored for one reason or the other. I feel I have attempted to answer EVERY question.

My TWO top questions are these.

Why will noone challenge Julian Becker with regard to his statement that he did not like the practices of Andrew Crossley and ACS:LAW yet was in email correspondence with him, in a supportive manner.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/86797733/Lett ... to-ACS-LAW

And number TWO

From the Wikipedia entry for Ben Dover

"Being paid ?100 a shoot, Honey started working for David Sullivan's Private Magazine[7] and European hardcore porn magazines such as Rodox/Color Climax, a Danish company that in addition to more "standard" hardcore material also produced bestiality and child pornography"

I would like some feedback on these two issues. Any further input is pointless on my part!

Before any one responds saying that Wikipedia can be tampered with... read this first and see why that is not the case

http://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-law ... ge-100402/

"No I will NOT defend everyone, I am there to provide info on the people behind this flawed system, that is all"

Beleive it or not, I have no issue with that.


"I was sent a link re you and Darker after what you had said regarding certain people in the past. The BBFC I believed was an "Authentic" source"

More proof that any system created by mankind is flawed. Says 2007 on that link

"I was referring to the IPlayer that uses Bitorrent a internal delivery and DRM although they may use the actual Iplay app as the verification"

DRM will work for the BBC but the big difference is, the content is free anyway I suspect they do it as part of their contractual obligations to companies they buy rights from ie territorial broadcasting

"Why will noone challenge Julian Becker with regard to his statement that he did not like the practices of Andrew Crossley and ACS:LAW yet was in email correspondence with him, in a supportive manner"

Julian offered to do it publicly and on film. Ive said that three times. I can see why he wouldnt put it on a forum when he could do it face to face with his opposers. At least its documented to be viewed wherever. Words can be manipulated and misunderstood. I can only say the man has been very forthcoming with my questions and seems to be making good headway with the courts.

"I would like some feedback on these two issues. Any further input is pointless on my part!"

Dude I gotta say thats one out of the party hat. How many things do we buy into each day and not realise what goes on behind the curtain. If you are suggestign they knew about what you are accusing them of I have no idea but in this knee jerk reaction to such things these days, if it were true they d be standing tall before the man on Monday morning faster than you can say Ben Dover you under arrest!

Puh-lease Hickster. Some of us have kids in this business as well. Please afford us some respect. It really bores me to tears when people play that child porn card because we are pornographers and in their minds we have no morals etc by virtue of what we do. This is a false representation.

If I had my way I would ban any discussion on child porn in any discussion I have about the porn industry because that isnt even part of my world or the world of this industry as I know it.

In fact, before people talk to me on camera I make my thoughts clear on that on the outset. It only serves to reinforce my thoughts of their total ignorance of this industry when they bring up child porn and human trafficking

People still stigmatise porn stars who do escorting. See this clip http://youtu.be/ufh2bB8kveA She says it at the end but it might help you to understand things you dont know as Im sure you dont watch porn.

If you did you might be better versed with your lines of inquiry

Dont worry its totally SFW

@OEJ Wrote "Julian offered to do it publicly and on film. Ive said that three times. I can see why he wouldnt put it on a forum when he could do it face to face with his opposers. At least its documented to be viewed wherever. Words can be manipulated and misunderstood. I can only say the man has been very forthcoming with my questions and seems to be making good headway with the courts."

http://newswire.xbiz.com/view.php?id=146471 Paragraph 9

Becker wrote " I was one of the biggest critics of their operation and spoke several times at adult forums and privately to several other companies in our industry of my concerns"

Really? OEJ, why can Becker do it in print but then wants to appear before a camera? Where are these posts on Forums I would love to see them, it seems he was not so shy about debating on Forums then, so why now?

And how do YOU square what he said with this leaked email, (Please read it) http://www.scribd.com/doc/86797733/Lett ... to-ACS-LAW

Can you TRULY say he was EVER a critic let alone "One of the biggest?" My criticism is there on google search, where is his?

@OEJ wrote "Dude I gotta say thats one out of the party hat. How many things do we buy into each day and not realise what goes on behind the curtain. If you are suggestign they knew about what you are accusing them of I have no idea but in this knee jerk reaction to such things these days, if it were true they d be standing tall before the man on Monday morning faster than you can say Ben Dover you under arrest!"

I think there is a difference between "buying into" and working for, but to keep on track, what is YOUR view? I am guessing you believe it to be untrue? that is fine, but I dont want to put words in your mouth.

These two points I would like to hear YOUR view on them, and others, I am aware that Becker will not answer, my open letter to him has gone unanswered, I realise why, he is not of import here, he will be offered a proper platform for an interview which I am sure he will back out from when the time is right. He has had his chance, moths ago, now I want to hear your take.

@OEJ Wrote " Please afford us some respect. It really bores me to tears when people play that child porn card because we are pornographers"

I accept that, however again I am posting what will be found by anyone who does a search for Ben Dover and will be of concern. I am of course not saying that ALL pornography is tainted by this.

To say I am backing out the party, I am not, but you accused me of beginning to become a Troll, or close to it. I am merely seeking the truth. (and please dont split that by asking, what is truth!)

I have no idea why he wont go on a forum. As I said, given your line of inquiry I can see why he wont but I cant speak for him. Im not sure why he would need to answer to you anyway as it seems this is all a distraction and detour from the real issue you are campaigning against.

Or perhaps it is part of your campaign to assassinate the characters of those you oppose as part of your propoganda against it

In fact I cant even comment on the things you mention that I have no knowledge of and certainly wont comment on links on the internet used to substantiate comments by a poster who is unknown to me.

This is the first time I have heard from anyone outside the industry of that companys association with child porn. So forgive me if I question the authenticity of your information with regards that one

Those are very serious allegations best left to people in positions able to deal with that effectively

@OEJ

Let me make a supposition. It is what your actions is based on, right? The letters of claim will tell the poor subscriber of the chance of Court proceedings, and your claim is not evidence but a balance of probabilities which if a Judge is 51% convinced, you win.

My supposition is that if there is a pattern of behaviour, then there is balance of probabilities there to be more than 50% chance of something being true.

Some suppositions are false, but make for light hearted humour. The character Lee Bowden for example had clients who created ?Granny? porn. Lee Bowden bought an ?Old folks? home, and installed an IT centre there. It doesn?t take two and two to make five, does it? I?m not going to gives links or anything, it is simply humour.

But let us going on to balance of probabilities. You can?t argue with that, as that is what your evidence is based on, right?

It has been brought up what Lindsay Honey has done. He has done time. He has sold counterfeit videos, and the original producers of those videos were ripped off. He also has worked for a Danish company that produced child porn. He is now heavily involved with speculative invoicing. Anyone reading this would have a more than 50% impression of a bad person. But that is how it works, right?

What about Mr Becker? Have you heard of ?Missing Trader Intra-Community? or ?Carousel? fraud regarding the theft of VAT from the Government?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_trader_fraud

?The fraud exploits this reclamation of tax. It lends itself to small, high value items, such as microchips and mobile telephones.?

This case on bailii relates to LMC Ltd v HMRC:

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cg ... od=boolean

?The only other evidence of a cancelled deal was in relation to a trade with Optime Strategies Ltd.?

There is no mention of direct evidence that Optime were involved with VAT fraud, but Optime exported mobile phones, and Mr Becker is now involved with ?Speculative Invoicing?. The balance of probabilities (i.e. more than 50% chance) that people reading this would see him as a bad person. But that is how it works, right?

Well. Doing well here aren?t we? At least the probabilities seem to suggest that.

What about the aforementioned Alireza Torabi? Bent monitoring, and bent person. His domain registrations are on a server with an IP address of 190.120.227.70. What is on this server? Look here:

http://statsie.com/ng3systems.com

It seems today for some reason, the server isn?t working. A google cache of xypy.net is here:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/s ... clnk&gl=uk

Even though it is in Persian, there is vpn@xypy.net and info@xypy.net. The text does translate to offering a VPN service, which anyone can bing or google translate. So his server hosts a VPN. It is funny that I brought this issue up, and now the server is down! Good old google cache!

As for his monitoring, nearly 3,000 IP addresses only relates to less than 1,000 subscribers. All this is evidence. The balance of probabilities (Again, a more than 50% chance) that people looking at this will think he is a bad monitoring person and dodgy. But that is how it works, right?

Oh well, it?s OK. You can still ignore things that you don?t like. You can still go on about how hard up you are without one bit of evidence to prove it. I believe you, despite no proof from you. You can also keep up the ?We have to take these actions to improve it? stance, which I think is a terrible thing to say. You can still bring up your friends and acquaintances with hard drives full of dodgy porn, without any proof of this. I believe you, despite the lack of proof.

I?m arguing the balance of probabilities, and people reading this may see a more than 50% chance that what GEIL and those associated are doing is a scam. But that is how it works, right?

@OEJ Wrote "Or perhaps it is part of your campaign to assassinate the characters of those you oppose as part of your propoganda against it"

You think I deal ion propaganda? as I have said SHOW me where I have written untruth! I am NOT a Troll, as you said, and I am NOT a liar.

@OEJ Wrote "This is the first time I have heard from anyone outside the industry of that companys association with child porn. So forgive me if I question the authenticity of your information with regards that one"

You mean you have only heard from WITHIN the industry before this? interesting

One more thing, OEJ it seems Becker does NOT need to comment before pre-arranged video interviews in front of an audience. See here

http://newswire.xbiz.com/view.php?id=157972

See once again a lack of integrity. I will prepare another post regarding this as it is so full of spin and mistruths it will need some looking at. BTW see that he is described as a "Producer for Ben Dover".

XBIZ is one of my favorite conferences as it usually attracts the type of person who is more interested in the financial rewards of the industry rather than what I term the 'hobbyists.' The London show provided both quality as well as sufficient numbers of delegates to make it a very productive two days. Despite the fact that I have been several years in the industry, I met a substantial amount of new potentially lucrative contacts as well as seeing some old faces and committing to rejuvenating previous relationships. The speed networking is a fantastic concept and this year provided quality contacts that I believe I can convert into revenue generating relationships."

? Ben Dover Productions' Julian Becker

I bet!

?We?ve had to wind down business because of enforcement of age verification over adult content in the U.K.? - Julian Becker (Nov 2012)

?The government is also looking at filtering and that poses a threat to the adult industry as well, This isn?t great news for the industry either.? - Julian Becker (Nov 2012)

"While personally I dislike this nanny state intervention" a ban wouldn't have any effect on our revenues as those that pay for our product have already registered their details as well as undertaking an age-verification process. It may even assist combating online piracy, therefore increasing our profits," - Julian Becker (May 2012)

You just never know WHAT to believe!

Seems like the pair of you have answered your own questions and it is wasted on this forum. if it has any validity then perhaps you should vent these defenses where they count.

Opposing it on the BGAFD may bring it to peoples attention but the fact is, no one here really cares.outside of us commenting on it. Theyve decided where they all stand on this from the outset

Thats why I feel it is important to fight back with the little stick we are given. As the saying I heard goes..."He may well not be the best man for the job but he might as well stick around until he gets here"