Has Copyright owners actions affected your choice?

[one eyed jack]

Guys. We can dance around the fire all day with this but for me its still a matter of letting people know that piracy, downloading, uploading, giving away whatever you want to call it is just wrong

The monitoring is flawed?

What does an innocent man look like? What does a guilty one look like?

Publicity on this is good. If people want to be anarchic and rebellious and do it all the more to be sheer bloody minded then they wouldve succeeded in reinforcing my opinion I was right in the first place.

Im still of the belief that people who download use password protection so their neighbours cant access their wifi

To quote a drinking buddy of mine the other day. He doesnt download porn but if he did he'd like to think that anything available for free on the internet came as part of the package of what he paid for his broadband monthly...then on the other hand I see someone I know selling hard drives for double the value with many videos downloaded from the internet on.

If this is the only stick to beat them over the head with then its all we got until something else better comes along. It just remains to be seen whether you see it as a fairer one if and when when that change does come around.

[Hickster]

@OEJ the ONLY Person on here "Dancing around the fire", is YOU

I have spent to long attempting to show you how flawed this whole process is, and I genuinely felt you could see that and would withdraw, however I realise now you were playing me, so well done, you got me!

Thing is, as far as I can see, I have been pretty straight with you, indeed I have promised to keep our email correspondence out of the public eye, I gave you my word, that still stands, as I am an honest person.


@OEJ Wrote "The monitoring is flawed?"

Yes I have already shown you that it is

@OEJ "What does an innocent man look like? What does a guilty one look like?"

It is not their appearance, but their actions that make a person guilty or innocent. You and your brigands, seem not to care whether they are or are not as long as they pay up, that is what makes you different from the rest of society.

@OEJ worte "Publicity on this is good. If people want to be anarchic and rebellious and do it all the more to be sheer bloody minded then they wouldve succeeded in reinforcing my opinion I was right in the first place."

Not quite sure what his passage means, however, the only sheer bloody minded person on this forum, is I am afraid yourself, why? because you repeatedly refuse to answer the questions put to you.

@OEJ wrote "Im still of the belief that people who download use password protection so their neighbours cant access their wifi"

Belief and actual facts are to different things. You also believe that Becker is doing this for the good of the Creative Industry, and that Torabis monitoring is not flawed, these beliefs are not backed by facts. I have shown you where the monitoring is flawed, I have also shown you where Becker lied, you never responded to that either.

I have actually had an open WIFI for years, anyone who comes to my house as a visitor can synch their phones on my connection

@OEJ wrote "To quote a drinking buddy of mine the other day. He doesnt download porn but if he did he'd like to think that anything available for free on the internet came as part of the package of what he paid for his broadband monthly...then on the other hand I see someone I know selling hard drives for double the value with many videos downloaded from the internet on."

Well I cant speak for your friends, and I have never heard of anyone selling Hard Drives full of material, I have heard of people selling counterfeit VHS tapes and DVDs, well so have you right? I believe you have just entered a pact with him... Ben Dover I believe!

@OEJ wrote "If this is the only stick to beat them over the head with then its all we got until something else better comes along. It just remains to be seen whether you see it as a fairer one if and when when that change does come around."

Well as I said, you have other remedies to deter people from copying in the first place, and yet you have abandoned them. You are not pursuing Tube sites, so your "fight" or rather "Alternative revenue stream" will be seen as bogus.

@Forum Am I angry? well lets put it this way, I dont like being played, but it was my fault placing trust in the first place, I cant blame anyone else but myself. I have learned my lesson though!

[Hickster]

So good enough for the BBC but not for you guys... I understand Hmmmm

[Hickster]

"Mike Wallace of Darker Enterprises, who has partnered with Mile Newcombe of MSS Interactive in order to set up Bluetime Films and run the PornXXX channel"

I wonder what ever happened to Bluetime Films? http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06601988

Wow look at that, JUST before Darker Enterprises started their association with ACS:LAW, strange timing that.

I know OEJ has said in the past he dies not do business with Darker Enterprises, I wonder if he knew about this "GDBTV"?

Anyway, must get some sleep

BTW you know that "no connection with Darker Enterprises"? http://www.bbfc.co.uk/website/Classifie ... 320035F8C3

Just a thought!

[one eyed jack]

"You and your brigands Hickster?" !laugh!

This isnt personal is it?

The problem I see is you will defend everybody because you have it in big time for this and thats fair enough. Theres a hero and a villain for everything except I believe the lines are blurred when you consider you know a lot more about me whilst I know absolutely nothing about you.

You been checking up on me on the BBFC as well now?

I think you'll find that data entry as me as director on that BBFC link is an error on the part of whoever filed it. I've worked with Katalin Varga but not for that title unless Darker Enterprises acquired the rights on a product I sold or was commissioned by Liquid Gold and retitled it but without seeing the content I have no idea if its something I've produced or not.

Am I under some kind of investigation to find inaccuracies to discredit my characters by suggesting I am a bad person to justify my association with GEIL?

I guess it helps you to see it that way. Fair enough. Whether I am a good person is only determined by htose that know me. Not what they read on the internet about me.

[one eyed jack]

Hickster wrote:

So good enough for the BBC but not for you guys... I understand Hmmmm


Im not one of those who believes everything the BBC tells me even though they have a respectable but flawed and questionable history themselves with regards recent events

Jimmy Saville and the Mark Duggan shooting. That documentary using actors and the police as themselves in their words was a travesty of documentary film making compared to their usual high standards

I guess the BBC are flawed as well

[one eyed jack]

In fact, there are plenty things in the past that Ive found out to the contrary from sources that Ive noticed in the the media reporting wild innaccuracies about.

Its as if someone tries to put two and two together in a rush to make it understandable in time before it goes out on the 6pm news

You mustve seen news change wildly from one day to the next surely? Mark Duggan is the best example. Princess Diana another

I saw it recently with the death of a woman on Barnet High street. It was ridiculous.

The victim of the fatal accident went from a young boy, girl in her teens to young woman in her 20's but was a 66 year old woman by the end of the week

The point of this is:

I dont believe a lot of things I read, especially when I don't know the source giving it to me. If they have an agenda to undermine what they oppose then its a question of bending the facts to suit that agenda enough to make the negatives outweigh any positives.

Too many people believe if it is in print and said by a bloke or woman with an honest face then it must be true.

[one eyed jack]

Directed by One Eyed Jack
The cast for this work includes: Buddy Ebsen, Irene Ryan, Donna Douglas, Max Baer

They sound like all american porn stars. I dont t know these people and never worked with them.


I know mike Newcombe. So what? Where are we going with this? it sound slike you are looking for an angle to associate me with ACS Law

I told you I am not and the more you continue with this digging makes me relaise all th emore why Julian doesnt even bother to respond to you.

I gave you the chance to do it publicly (for my film of course s I admit I want something out of it ) but you rebuffed that with excuses of me manipulating the footage in favour of my friends.

Quid pro quo Hickster. Who am I really answering to?

Now youre digging up stuff you dont know about trying to connect the dots in the hope it will undermine me as a person and lend credit to your investigative skills

For the record, just becaue I know Mike Newcombe does not mean I am in any way affiliated with ACS Law. Dont try and confuse people with that Hickster, youre dangerously coming close to being a troll with these accusations and false associations

I know many people in the adult industry. So what of it?

[Hickster]

@OEJ Wrote "I dont t know these people and never worked with them"

I suggest you contact the organisation and have your details removed then! I have only posted to you what is on the internet.

@OEJ "I know mike Newcombe. So what? Where are we going with this? it sound slike you are looking for an angle to associate me with ACS Law"

I am not tying you to ACS:LAW at all, I know Becker was through Tilly Baily Irvine. and also here

http://www.scribd.com/doc/86797733/Lett ... to-ACS-LAW

@OEJ wrote "I told you I am not and the more you continue with this digging makes me relaise all th emore why Julian doesnt even bother to respond to you."

That would be Julian that you said you only knew casually yet more and more you seems to be speaking on his behalf. The above link clearly shows a link between Becker and Crossley, yet you refuse to acknowledge it Why?

@OEJ "I gave you the chance to do it publicly (for my film of course s I admit I want something out of it ) but you rebuffed that with excuses of me manipulating the footage in favour of my friends."

And I told you I was warned by Legal to not take you up, I did thanyou for the other though!

@OEJ "Quid pro quo Hickster. Who am I really answering to?"

The person who until you changed tact was having a cordial exchange

@OEJ "Now youre digging up stuff you dont know about trying to connect the dots in the hope it will undermine me as a person and lend credit to your investigative skills"

I am not digging up anything that is not already public. and why would I undermine you? I believe you have already done that yourself by joining an action that you beyond a resonable doubt is flawed


@OEJ "Dont try and confuse people with that Hickster, youre dangerously coming close to being a troll with these accusations and false associations"

That is a wicked accusation to say I am a troll, I have said before to point out where I have posted ANYTHING incorrect. A troll is someone who harasses with false accusation, I have not and never would.

[Hickster]

@OEJ "You and your brigands Hickster?" !laugh! This isnt personal is it?"

No it isnt, that comment is based on a leaked email describing ACS:LAW/TBI who were representing Golden Eye, and it was a comment regarding the previous operators, Davenport Lyons.

http://acsbore.files.wordpress.com/2010 ... rogant.gif

It was tongue in cheek

@OEJ "The problem I see is you will defend everybody because you have it in big time for this and thats fair enough. Theres a hero and a villain for everything except I believe the lines are blurred when you consider you know a lot more about me whilst I know absolutely nothing about you."

No I will NOT defend everyone, I am there to provide info on the people behind this flawed system, that is all.

@OEJ "You been checking up on me on the BBFC as well now?"

No just amazed when ? I was sent a link re you and Darker after what you had said regarding certain people in the past. The BBFC I believed was an "Authentic" source

@OEJ Wrote "I think you'll find that data entry as me as director on that BBFC link is an error on the part of whoever filed it. I've worked with Katalin Varga but not for that title unless Darker Enterprises acquired the rights on a product I sold or was commissioned by Liquid Gold and retitled it but without seeing the content I have no idea if its something I've produced or not."

It was filed by Darker Enterprises, as I said I believed the BBFC was an "Authentic" site even "Authoritative"

@OEJ "Am I under some kind of investigation to find inaccuracies to discredit my characters by suggesting I am a bad person to justify my association with GEIL?"

No, people tend to show that themselves in what they say and how they act.