Re: *INDUSTRY TESTING & DATABASE DISCUSSION*
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:51 pm
I feel as if Im going over all ground that wa salready explained within this very same thread as to what is/ was going on.
UKAP and many more non members like Harmony, Relish (even Killergram) and a dozen more (including Blue Bird) were in support of this as I have been in contact with all of them.
Keni did his bit to reach out to the model community and the reason why it has not progressed forward from its December 5th meeting is simply because the clinics did not see enough support to make it worth their while investing their time and effort in making it happen. Just because a certain company offered to front the money but were not available to back this up by appearing on the day is not enough to make it happen.
an open invitation was put out to the industry to attend (which caused me a great deal of flack within UKAP) because I felt this decision had to be endorsed by the very people who were in the front line to use it.
In order to understand what is going on one must read what is going on and Ive informed people every step of the way at the risk of pissing off civilian posters of this forum by coming on here with it to get the attention of the silent majority who anonymously come on here.
As you might have known Keni has lost steam on this subject as well now after his efforts have largely amounted to nothing.
The clinics ar einterested still but we have to show and prove now. the goal post have been moved and th eonly way this will move forward by showing its support by paying for it now. UKAP was merely the conduit to make this happen as the clinics that were behind making this happen had no idea how to get so many people in one place.
i would have said AITA would have been their first port of call but it seems they have the interests of their retailers at heart over an industry health issue they may consider solely in the realm of those producing the content (why should the retailers care if performers live or die eh?) hence why i even went out further to get one government advisor on health and safety and TVX sent another lawyer who represented the clinics....Given some of the comments I have heard for this schemes failure to launch no tone person has accounted for the fact that people just didnt bother turn up and would rather listen tohear say from people on the periphery of the business than listen to their peers that are in actually in it.
To quote one statement: "well a lot of people are saying a lot of negative things about UKAP" When asked who Im like "Who are they? they'r enot even in the business"
The clinics have suggested we producers are the paymasters and that we should be setting the standards but then I (we) explained the business doesnt run like that.
Who really has the power to make this compulsory in the business?
The answer is all of you. producers and performers. this scheme has been met with derision and contempt in th eminority when it should have been embraced by all whether UKAP was in the driving seat or not.
Maybe it failed because of peoples apathy and distrust of UKAP. Thats fine. Maybe models should set themselves up an association and deal with it themselves.
Like several other projects I have only responded to demand and this is the outcome.
My apologies for harping on about this but all the answers were there in the audio recording.
UKAP and many more non members like Harmony, Relish (even Killergram) and a dozen more (including Blue Bird) were in support of this as I have been in contact with all of them.
Keni did his bit to reach out to the model community and the reason why it has not progressed forward from its December 5th meeting is simply because the clinics did not see enough support to make it worth their while investing their time and effort in making it happen. Just because a certain company offered to front the money but were not available to back this up by appearing on the day is not enough to make it happen.
an open invitation was put out to the industry to attend (which caused me a great deal of flack within UKAP) because I felt this decision had to be endorsed by the very people who were in the front line to use it.
In order to understand what is going on one must read what is going on and Ive informed people every step of the way at the risk of pissing off civilian posters of this forum by coming on here with it to get the attention of the silent majority who anonymously come on here.
As you might have known Keni has lost steam on this subject as well now after his efforts have largely amounted to nothing.
The clinics ar einterested still but we have to show and prove now. the goal post have been moved and th eonly way this will move forward by showing its support by paying for it now. UKAP was merely the conduit to make this happen as the clinics that were behind making this happen had no idea how to get so many people in one place.
i would have said AITA would have been their first port of call but it seems they have the interests of their retailers at heart over an industry health issue they may consider solely in the realm of those producing the content (why should the retailers care if performers live or die eh?) hence why i even went out further to get one government advisor on health and safety and TVX sent another lawyer who represented the clinics....Given some of the comments I have heard for this schemes failure to launch no tone person has accounted for the fact that people just didnt bother turn up and would rather listen tohear say from people on the periphery of the business than listen to their peers that are in actually in it.
To quote one statement: "well a lot of people are saying a lot of negative things about UKAP" When asked who Im like "Who are they? they'r enot even in the business"
The clinics have suggested we producers are the paymasters and that we should be setting the standards but then I (we) explained the business doesnt run like that.
Who really has the power to make this compulsory in the business?
The answer is all of you. producers and performers. this scheme has been met with derision and contempt in th eminority when it should have been embraced by all whether UKAP was in the driving seat or not.
Maybe it failed because of peoples apathy and distrust of UKAP. Thats fine. Maybe models should set themselves up an association and deal with it themselves.
Like several other projects I have only responded to demand and this is the outcome.
My apologies for harping on about this but all the answers were there in the audio recording.