egafd.com

Seems DLT is now being looked into.



Who next?

Taffoski wrote:

> Seems DLT is now being looked into.
>
>
>
> Who next?


I'm sorry but this smacks of bullshit to me.

Even if we accept at face value Vivien Creegor's claim that she said nothing at the time so as not to "rock the boat", DLT left the Beeb in the early '90s so she could have come forward then.

Again I'm not defending any wrongdoing (if indeed there was any) but for fuck's sake ... she's had 20 years to come forward so why leave it until now?

Could it be that her career is on the slide and she thinks that in the current climate, this is a better bet than going on "I'm a Celebrity" to give her profile a bit of a boost? Maybe that's it, as come to think of it I don't remember the last time I saw her on TV.

As for the other claim against him, that dates back to 1977 so once again - how on earth is it possible to either prove or disprove it? It's just yet more "she said he said" and wouldn't stand up in a court of law.

- Eric

Millions of blokes have tried to put their hands up skirts over the years.!tut! I'm waiting for a knock at the door from !bobby!

Eric,

I agree with you. I am sure that a lot more people will come out with allegations that can be unproven.

Flat Eric:

You are of course correct in your assertion that the whole affair has become "Trial by media" and there is no "Proof" to be had by any of the claimants.

In this however, lies the whole reason why Savile got away with his shenanigans for so long. He knew how to play the system. He knew it would always be his word, ie "TV's Gran & Kiddies Fave Icon of Kindness and Charity" against some ghastly, vindictive so called, "Victim". Any barrister employed by Savile would have been able to rip any girl or boy's testimony to shreds in a matter of minutes.

Only in recent years have they allowed video evidence to be given and only in recent years have the police shown any sympathy towards those with similar allegations. In the 1970's a copper would have fallen about laughing if a girl turned up at the station claiming "Savile raped me!" He would have shouted, "Be orff with ya you vindictive little bitch, Jimmy has done more good in one day than you'll ever do in yer whole miserable life!"

This is why none of the victims dared to take him on in life, their lives would have been destroyed by him AND the media at the time and indeed the very authorities that existed to supposedly protect children. eg Esther Rantzens "Childline".

This is why all the victims are now crawling out of the wood work, because they have seen that they were not alone. I cannot for the life of me see why anyone would make spurious allegations for "Publicity" or "Compo" only to face a grilling by the authorities and no doubt hate mail from Savile fans and little chance of any compo. I can't even imagine the media is paying any money out for stories any more as there are simply too many emerging.

I agree it is a terrible shame this is all happening after the fucker died a peaceful death, but lets face it, if it weren't for Glitter taking his PC into PC World to be fixed, he too would have almost certainly carried on his work as well, unhindered. Savile never owned a computer, so he never communicated with his compadres in a solid form, probably only ever in person or by phone.

This is probably the only reason he wasn't ever caught!

Maybe the whole Savile debacle is just the tip of the iceberg. I found this web page, which could well be the rantings of a lunatic, but it appears to suggest that that child abuse has been going on and covered up at the highest levels of the government since Edward Heath's time. There is a sort of sense in all this, Savile would have been feted by politicians of all parties and maybe it is not so far fetched to imagine Tony Blair "Slapping a D notice" on some allegation about to be made in a newspaper about his mate Jimmy Savile or some other bastard. I am not saying you should believe any of it, but it certainly adds a new dimension to this whole sordid affair.

Reading between the lines is quite interesting:

'....all the victims are now crawling out of the wood work...'

A rather unpleasant turn of phrase to use about those claiming he abused them, Jim, especially considering the generally sympathetic view of the rest of your post.

"This is why none of the victims dared to take him on in life, their lives would have been destroyed by him AND the media at the time and indeed the very authorities that existed to supposedly protect children. eg Esther Rantzens "Childline".

So let's get this right. Jim Slip who dresses up like Jimmy Savile on a number of occasions to re-enact one of his alleged paedophile attacks in order to make a few quid for his porn site, attacks the work done by Childline.


Nice, Jim, real nice!

The crowned "king of hypocrisy" calling ME a hypocrite! lol

if you had a brain in your head you would realise I was parodying the cunt, via a character called, Jimmy Saveloy! I was risking Savile's wrath by taking the piss out of him WHEN HE WAS ALIVE! which is more than most did. I was doing no more than Frankie Boyle will dare to do now his dead!

The character had , "Lost his job on telly" and now lived on the streets. Why would I coat my shell suit in stained tea, to look like he'd pissed himself, have bronchitis or scratch myself during my exploits! Why did a magazine who shot Jimmy Saveloy deem the character "Too disgusting" for publication? Of course you are too dumb to understand what, "Parody" is. Your idea of comedy is "24 hours with Ben Elton"

But let's face it, this is not about Savile at all is it? You simply hate me for exposing you as the little goose stepping Stalin you really are and you hate and loathe me for it. You don't really give a flying fuck about the Savile case or the victims. Or maybe it is because my last post, has implied Tony Blair, your God, and possibly other top politicians, may have had a hand in censoring information about certain dodgy celebs?

Also, spookily, I seem to recall you hysterically screaming of the "injustice" at the arrest of the hordes of Pakistani paedos that had been allowed, nay, sanctioned, by New Labour to run amok, you were most perturbed as I recall. My only surprise was that you weren't found outside the prison protesting with a placard saying, "FREE THE ROCHDALE 6 (Or more), THEY WERE ONLY SHARING THEIR CULTURAL DIVERSITY!"

You went on and on for days how wrong it all was, ie their arrests NOT their activity! lol

Off course again, you didn't give a toss about the victims in this case, you were just pissed off that you simply couldn't blame the Tories. If they had been in power during this gross injustice you would have been foaming at the mouth with indignation and demanded the return of the noose for all the perpetrators and the whole front bench of the Tory Party! lol

Like all political nutters, you are truly vacuous and a complete hypocrite!

Now then, Jimbo, now then

How's about this pic you posted. How's about it then?

[img]http://static.payserve.com/static_01/30 ... midi_1.jpg[/img]

Are you dressed as Jimmy Savile? Yes or No?

Is the adult model in this pic acting the part of a schoolgirl? Yes or No?

Are you trying to make a few quid out of acting as Jimmy Savile taking advantage of a model acting as a schoolgirl? Yes or No?

Is it then hypocritical for someone like yourself to slag off an organisation like Childline which is now part of the NSPCC that has tried for over 20 years to help children physically and sexually abused ?

"I seem to recall you hysterically screaming of the "injustice" at the arrest of the hordes of Pakistani paedos"

"You went on and on for days how wrong it all was, ie their arrests NOT their activity! lol"

I will give you the opportunity to back this up with any of my quotes on BGAFD which suggest that I have stated that it is "an injustice to arrest Pakistani paedophiles" or "how wrong it all was, ie. their arrests".

I await a reply from you.

Failure to do so on your part will prove what I already know, to all BGAFD forumites, you are a fucking liar!