egafd.com

Porn Baron wrote:

> I must admit I thought this was a lot of nonsense at first. I
> could'nt understand why they didn't report it sooner. But it
> seems it's all true and nobody did anything.
> Ratzen is as guilty as all the others.
>
> Looks like many more had their finger in the pie. Cliff Richard
> next? Didn't somebody from that scottish boy band of the
> seventies get done? What the fuck were they called??? Please
> not my hero Noddy Holder
>
I think you mean the manager of the Bay City Rollers, Tam Paton?



Or the member of the band Derek Longmuire



And of course let us not forget another "Gran's fave" Mathew Kelly:



The Jimmy Savile thing just keeps getting worse and now I read there are links with this cunning, bastard to the abuse in that kids home in Jersey that was heavily reported a few years ago, but for the life of me I can't remember hearing the name,"Savile" being mentioned at the time!

Bay city rollers how could I ever forget those orrible tartan scarfs.

Matthew Kelly !shocked! Not him from Game for a Laugh. NO

This has been either the top story, or in the top two, on every news programme for a fortnight now. I wonder if they'll ever stop reporting it. More people are bound to come forward in the coming days and weeks saying he molested them and the media machine will keep rolling. It is terrible that he did what he did, I just don't see what can be achieved by going on and on and on and on about it after the guy is dead.

Them twatts were popular in Belfast whilst I there and squaddies being squaddies we fucked their name about and to us they were the Stray Bitty Strollers. Bunch of tuneless talentless wankers they were.

You better get comfortable, cos I think this is just the start, it would appear Savile was a very busy little bee!

Yep this is going to go on and its going to infect quite a few big names from all accounts -seems that it was rife and there were a few that paticipated in the doings.

This is why its going to roll as there are many out there that are still alive and can be proscecuted - and it will be quite shocking at just how many were implicated. I think we can say good buy to Esther......

Sorry steve56 but you ought to be old enough to understand that you shouldn't believe everything that you read in The Sun.

This one doesn't fit in with Savile's M.O. (teenage girls) at all, and reeks of 'chancer' out to make a few bob in compo and from flogging his "story" to the gutter press.

Let's face it, just about any cunt could go to the papers and claim that Jim "fixed it" for them when they were youngsters. Male or female. I mean - who can prove otherwise?

And now that the prospect of compo is being openly discussed, expect plenty more gold-diggers to jump aboard the gravy train claiming that they're "traumatised victims".

Seems to me that there's going to be a real problem now sorting out the genuine cases from the frauds. That is if they're even going to try and bother, because it looks like just about every claim is now just being taken at face value and accepted as fact.

- Eric

I'd love to agree with you Flat Eric, but no one is really sure of what Savile's MO was, except it is appearing to be and man, woman and possibly beast! In fact any warm blooded mammal that happened to cross his path!

At the beginning of this topic there were many who were incredulous at even the most mild of allegations and with each day come new even more horrific stories including the one I just read where he'd been given his own, "Cell" in Broadmoor to operate from!

However as a footnight I read another article where he'd been banned from a childrens home in the 1970's, naturally all this was all hushed up for expediency and for the "benefit" of the child and a "Man's career!" I wonder if Esther Rantzen had been in charge! lol

I can't see anyone lightly making an allegation, what is the point in bringing down a huge pile of shit on yourself. Getting any compo is pretty far fetched. I would wager the allegations will turn out to be genuine.

Jim, my point still stands, i.e. (a) these are all just allegations in the media and very hard to prove (or more to the point - disprove) and (b) don't just take as absolute gospel everything you read in the red-tops.

Look at your own link. The key words are "it is claimed". And let's face it, there's nothing to stop any fucker who's so much as been in the same building as Savile at any point since the '60s onwards from going to the papers and "claiming" owt. But who's to say what's true and what's bullshit?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not defending the pervy cunt if he did what he's being accused of. And I'm sure that at least some of the allegations have legs. Too much smoke for there not to be any fire.

But my concern now is that this whole thing is heading off into a hysterical trial-by-media witch hunt by a baying media mob, with ever more outlandish claims that will be very hard to prove one way or another being made by chancers out to make a fast buck and/or get their 15 minutes of fame, and that any real victims will get lost in the mix.

- Eric