Page 11 of 12

Re: 9/11 prediction

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:27 am
by Seymour Clearly
Of course there is an explanation for the collapse of WTC7...it did suffer structural damage throught fires and collapsed..

http://wtc.nist.gov/progress_report_jun ... endixl.pdf

Re: 9/11 prediction

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:09 pm
by NandoRick
"Of course there is an explanation for the collapse of WTC7...it did suffer structural damage throught fires and collapsed.."


Oh thats right cause steel frame buildings usally collapse through fire , can you give any examples of biuldings collapsing through fire before or after 9/11.

Also world trade 3,4,5,6 placed directly under the twin towers took much worse damage from the collapse of the towers but they never fell ...strange.


Re: 9/11 prediction

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 3:14 pm
by Robches
"so quote the abuse then...oh you can't...

or was "bollocks" too much for you...a bit rich in a porn site where far more explicit terms are used endlessly!"

You were not attempting to discuss anything, you were just being snide, and you still are. Why should you expect any other response if that's your attitude?

Re: 9/11 prediction

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:38 am
by Robches
Leave it Warren, it's not worth it!

Re: 9/11 prediction

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:28 am
by Robches
>so, why do we pay our taxes to them?

tell me please! seing as your so convinced about how bad they are

either:

1) we are as bad as they are

or

2) we are really ignorant, and need guys like you to put us right

or

3) this is all bollocks, and you just like being "clever" and "in the know">

Jesus H. Christ, are you telling me you weren't trying to be a snidey bastard with these remarks?


Re: 9/11 prediction

Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 6:52 pm
by Robches
Jesus Christ, give it a rest Rumpole.