egafd.com

Thats because no one has nominated them. Maybe no one cares but the point is if people want to make a difference they should nominate or things will be what they will be.

Take a look around for yourself here on this forum, its not as popular as it used to be and people spend more time moaning about the state of the business than trying to do anything about it

If people think UKAP is redundant then its members would only be too pleased to rejoin another association that can outperform it better given the situation

Fact is I wasnt happy about the awards in previous years and I'm ok with how it is knowing it isnt being interfered with by certain bullying enterprises doing so with menaces and that wasnt even anything to do with UKAP

Otther awards are bought by way of sponsoring the event which in effect is paying for its wn awardds but I don't see anyone complaining about that so why pick on UKAP?

Is it any wonder why posters are considered trolls when they only have one or two postts to their name when they comment?

Who are you VintageTog? You seem to be so active with Jimmy Jimmy that you could be in tthe business yourself? You could have a motive behind your line of queestioning for all I know. I dont even know who you are but all I ve knon you for so arr is a complaint about NerdPervert and now UKAP.

To quote Jimmy Jimmy....Hmmm interesting...

Well so far one eyed jack I have posted here my experiences on a rip off web site and also I have questioned the nominations for your awards and in return I have been called a troll. No wonder people don't use this site very much anymore unless they own a television station.


one eyed jack wrote:

> Thats because no one has nominated them. Maybe no one cares but
> the point is if people want to make a difference they should
> nominate or things will be what they will be.
>
> Take a look around for yourself here on this forum, its not as
> popular as it used to be and people spend more time moaning
> about the state of the business than trying to do anything
> about it
>
> If people think UKAP is redundant then its members would only
> be too pleased to rejoin another association that can
> outperform it better given the situation
>
> Fact is I wasnt happy about the awards in previous years and
> I'm ok with how it is knowing it isnt being interfered with by
> certain bullying enterprises doing so with menaces and that
> wasnt even anything to do with UKAP
>
> Otther awards are bought by way of sponsoring the event which
> in effect is paying for its wn awardds but I don't see anyone
> complaining about that so why pick on UKAP?
>
> Is it any wonder why posters are considered trolls when they
> only have one or two postts to their name when they comment?
>
> Who are you VintageTog? You seem to be so active with Jimmy
> Jimmy that you could be in tthe business yourself? You could
> have a motive behind your line of queestioning for all I know.
> I dont even know who you are but all I ve knon you for so arr
> is a complaint about NerdPervert and now UKAP.
>
> To quote Jimmy Jimmy....Hmmm interesting...
>
>

Yes I know what you mean

Posts like yours don't help either which is why most people from the biz dont post here anymore.

People who use pseudonyms to complain and accuse sites of being rip off merchants when theyre not are usually seen as trolls

Surely you can see the other side of this too?