Page 2 of 2

Re: Rocco's stuff...

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 11:35 am
by clive
All good points...
But ultimately many of us just find it a little bit ugly...
In essence what a male watches is how they envisage themselves in a fantasy scenario. I do not go for any of Roccos tricks and slight brutalism, so his films have limited appeal sometimes (although he wasnt too bad with John S)
A better perfromer in many ways is Peter north. Less "adventurous" but conveys enjoyment of the right kind...for me anyway

Re: Rocco's stuff...

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:06 pm
by slater


Hi, I just wanted to interject this thought, I like some of roccos films, (buttman and earlier stuff) but as i move through porn I find that the same things dont work.

Almost like a drugs obsession, porn does lead to harder porn just becuase of the need for something new, everybody who has a wife or girlfriend should agree that as the relationship builds you begin to experiment and go further. its the same with porn in my view.

I know for a fact that if Im watching a rocco film Im going to se something a little rougher than usual and Im not saying that I always need that but sometimes you feel in the mood to take it to that next level.
But if I am actually having sex at the time Im watching a rocco film i find that I personally become more aggressive too, dont know if thats a bad sign for me but Ive certainly had no complaints :)

on the whole I realise that a lot of people dont want to see the rougher sex scenes and I personally dont like the idea of kelly getting fags put out on her tits (honestly, such a great set being treated so badly! theres no justice) but I think that someone has put out that product becuase it has a huge audience. If you dont fancy it then just watch something softer.

Its a dirty job, but someones got to do it!

Slater

Re: Attn Josephine ??33?

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 2:42 pm
by josphine ??33?
Thanks OEJ.

'I can see how you might have taken offence and I apologise for offending your sensibilities if I have'

I haven't taken offence and my sensibilites aren't offended (that sounded like a really strange line -OEJ's not mine).

I am not sure if Rocco does do 'psycho sexual menaces' - his english isn't that good. Maybe coming through an italian accent it breaks the seriousness of the verbals. He likes to be in control but notice that in the scene with Kelly Stafford where Kelly was being taken from behind on an exercise bench IIRC, Kelly felt like she had broken her nose and Rocco immediately stopped shagging her. Aggressiveness I thought was related to the size of his member(and it's 'hardness') and the peak of orgasm/stimulation that he continues with (and that's why he makes 'exhausting' films).

FAO Clive

Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2003 8:55 am
by John
I don't entirely disagree with your point, but then again - speaking only from my own point of view, I generally don't envisage myself playing out the lead role when I watch a movie!

Does it inspire me? Possibly it does, yes... but as I have said - when I was with the submissive girlfriend, I genuinely felt very uncomfortable playing the "games" she wanted to play... and I think that would be the same if I tried to re-enact the works of Rocco...

To me, its just something a bit more intense, a bit extreme, out of the ordinary and I find something intensely erotic in it... Nothing sinister and I certainly couldn't see myself putting a girl through her paces in his inimitable style...