egafd.com

In the archive, Hannah mentions a website dedicated to her set up by Mr T. Is this still around?

Thanks, Tiberius.

Reading between the lines, and from watching the former's scene, I think the issue with both Amanda and Hannah was that Rocco or his people were insufficiently up-front about the forthcoming 'action'.
Of course, had they been completely frank, then both may have made their excuses and left, before or after signing on the dotted line........

"Hannah dosen't seem to be enjoying herself at all"

Then why be a party to that kind of tripe in the first place? Surley Hannah had some inckling as to what Rocco and Stafford were about. The question provkes a smigen of irritation in me due to the fact that if models were to say to producers of such material "Hey, what kind of girl do you think I am? I'm not doing this and not letting you treat me like that in your crap movie beacuse it will make me look really trashy and downgrade my public image" then producers of Rocco type material would have to shut up shop and go away.

Dibble.

porns one thing, slapping someone about another eh?

"The sadistic element appeals to many viewers."

Doesn't appeal to me. What would appeal to me is being sadistic to those sados that it does appeal to.

"I dont include Miss Staffords obvious enjoyment in that definition of females looking uncomfortable because her role in these films is usually very "male" ie she helps Rocco out by dishing out the slapping, spitting and general humiliation. And her sexual nature seems very predatory. I still remember that bizzare scene where even Rocco had to tell her to stop beating up that dwarf in the nappy because the little chap looked terrified and on the verge of tears. Shes a strange girl is Kelly."

Tell you what; I reckon all this Rocco nonsense is a load of pretentious psychosexual bollocks. Rocco and Stafford are navel gazing. A shag is a shag. Wouldn't it be like a breath of fresh air if in his next movie Rocco simply got dressed up as a plumber and took his 'ballcock' round to fix a nice ladies pipes only to end up having his knob sucked and then being invited to shag the ladies agreeably unpretentious fanny? Then maybe he could stop for a cup of tea before going back to the depot? That would certainly do for me if the lady was sexually attractive i.e., didn't look like a 'porn star' and I think that would do for a lot of other folks to.

Dibble.

It doesnt appeal to me either officer. But it does appeal to many hence Roccos wealth. And his films are the most popular on Italian pay TV.

His habit of ending a scene by pissing in the girls gob and then flushing her head down the toilet is not my idea of good porn. But if people like watching it then fine as long as the girls who participate are warned about whats expected of them first and agree without pressure. According to Hannah she was met with verbal abuse and a slap round the chops from Stafford when she objected to the direction the scene was going in. Often many less confident girls feel that once they are there they have to do as they are told otherwise they wont get paid and word will get round the porno grapevine that they are awkward and not worth booking. This is probably more true with eastern bloc girls.

And if they had walked out prior to the scene would you consider that a bad thing? Would you feel deprived that those scenes never made it onto tape?

It wasnt just the lack of info provided prior to the shoot that upset Hannah. I remember her saying it was also the reaction she got from them when she expressed unease about the rough sex she was being subjected to. In any other job if you complain to your employer about something you dont expect to get a slap and insulted.

Agree 100%.

First point: then I'd never have known about them.......
Second point: see below.

Not to Rocco, it isn't.