Page 2 of 2

Re: Here it is

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 12:16 pm
by countb
Purestorm wouldnt accept me as a member.I found that odd as I submitted some tasty but amateur stuff(ive never pretended to be a pro photographer)...I move in different circles if you follow my drift but 650 quid??
I dont believe it for one mo,thats the rate for some girls overnight stays.
I am not a fan of Purestorm and its not sour grapes as I dont need em..suffice to say I could put you in touch with many top flight models and 400 quid is a fair 2 hour stint.
It does cast a slur against the top togs on here so theres 2 reasons I dont believe it
1 Unprotected? Never,we all avoid the AW ads for that
2 The inferences made,my take is if you are going to make a comment ,name em and let them defend themselves.Its worse than JeremyKyle stuff all this crap

rant over


Re: Has anyone seen the frenzy going on at purestorm

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 7:23 pm
by Toliverwist
Purestorm is too judgemental for me. They want to assess me and my images. Well they can p?ss off. Who judges them? Only themselves, I bet. In any case, I find AIR far more useful as a contact between togs and models.

However, back to the substantive issue, and it's best to bear in mind that Purestorm's controlling, judgemental attitude did nothing to prevent a pervert's harassment of a model, these types demonstrate nothing but contempt for these lovely ladies who place their trust in those who want to photograph them .

The perverts who try and take advantage of the particular circumstances to indulge their lusts on innocent and vulnerable young ladies should have their greasy stuff cut off and stuffed in their mouths until they choke.

Our models deserve better.


Re: Has anyone seen the frenzy going on at purestorm

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:36 pm
by one eyed jack
As long as you cant name the people to come out and defend themselves then all this posting about some phantom tog is a waste of time.

I want facts

All this seems to breed is contempt and paranoia.

Who is to say this is not a big misunderstanding? Its my understanding that many cheeky chappy models will meet one girl he will forget to act like a professional and dare suggest he wouldn't mind doing more.

That's how some blokes are. As Kim said, its probably best to mention it on UKAP and offer this person the chance to explain themselves

Lets be honest as well, no one is saying it but given some of the responses I've read you know who is lying and who is not and can make up your own mind and I think that's how it best works.

We're still waiting for the threats of libel that haven't come yet. These are usually empty threats from people that think legal action will have us running for the hills and really surprises that a lot of forums haven't sussed this out yet that no one is going to take you to court for something said on a porn forum unless it is wildy untrue and damaging.

So far it seems to be just legitimate complaints and the young lady in question should not fear speaking up. At the very least it will inspire dialogue and if necessary, a public apology


Re: Has anyone seen the frenzy going on at purestorm

Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 9:52 pm
by videokim
Well said xx


Re: Has anyone seen the frenzy going on at purestorm

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 1:24 pm
by countb
Anybody think Purestorm encouraged it all for publicity?
Its well known they have been struggling......it all sounds a load of bollocks to me.


Re: Has anyone seen the frenzy going on at purestorm

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 2:36 pm
by puretotty
That is vile... asking for oral sex ! It's full sex or nothing for me ;)


Re: Has anyone seen the frenzy going on at purestorm

Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 3:49 pm
by countb
I asked a girl to let me shag her where it opens out into her back garden
I call that backdoor sex and there was no extra charge
Lintils for tea anyone?