Items liable for seizure

A read-only and searchable archive of posts made to the BGAFD forum from 11/08/2000 to 14/03/2003.
postie

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by postie »

does this mean urology (possibly spelt wrong) is now deamed acceptable?
joe king

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by joe king »

I am surprised at enemas, maybe they gave me half a list (because it doesn't contain 'urolagnia') although you could argue piss is excrement. But actually pissing is okay, not urolagnia.
Whatr sort of interest is unnatural?
steve56

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by steve56 »

its all very confusing.
joe king

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by joe king »

yes, isn't
joe king

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by joe king »

I don't know weather I'm cumming or going, (see what I've done steve?)
steve56

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by steve56 »

it happens to me at times joe.
joe king

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by joe king »

just repeat after me steve 'The forum provides a phatic function'
'The forum provides a phatic function'
'The forum provides a phatic function'
'The forum provides a phatic function'
'The forum provides a phatic function'
...
steve56

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by steve56 »

tongue twister?
joe king

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by joe king »

u can twist what you like with it steve
jj

Re: Items liable for seizure

Post by jj »

As I understand it, urolagnia (sexual stimulation from the playing with or drinking of another's piss) is right out: they get the willies (sorry) even just with solo female pissing, but they do allow it (presumably if it's 'in context', ho ho) on suffrance.
Idiots......what's the betting they were all bed-wetters who then got told it was 'disgusting' and 'filthy'? And now they foist their irrational prejudices on the rest of us.
Locked