egafd.com

And please god do not turn this into a pissing contest.
I'm sure you have Brook's contact details - I know you have Demi's because you pestered her for months after she got with me. You can ask either of them if I look like a mug.

LOL I am glad your not scared of any litergation... as you have just commited liable on a public board, I think you will indeed need your "witnesses" I have screen grabbed what accusations you have made... and look forward to taking every penny you have.

As your confident of your position in this matter you wont mind sending me your address so my lawyers can serve you with a write, right ? I see you hide your contact details on whois, I can guess why

So Daz Savage... I do intend to take you to court, you can email your address to steve@thestudiomk.com and I will get the papers served this week.

Now unlike you I wont rely on "loud mouth" tactics, I will simply stick to the facts... so let's state the truth about your claims (LOL)

1. Are you the same Steve who promised Demi Scott not to produce a site on her and then sold the material to another company who did just that?

Answer: No I am the Steve Chamberlain who shot Demi Stott for TrashyContent.com a company I run that shoots content for re sale, a fact that Miss Demi Scott was fully aware of when she shot for us. We make no guarantees as to where and how this content will be used EVER !

We did discuss the idea of doing a site for Demi at some point, but this never came about... we did indeed go back to Demi but she informed us she had gone with another webmaster, at which point we wished her the best.

2. Are you the same Steve who took nearly a year to even make Louisa Lockheart's site... meanwhile you were selling the content you were getting her to do for free to the same company above so they could produce a site? And when she mentioned this to you you said it was all an ACCIDENT and you gave her ?100 to set things straight!!!

Answer: The launch of LouiseMay.com did indeed take longer to launch that we had hoped, there were various reasons for this but none based on ripping any one off. We did shoot Louisa May for Trashy Content as well, we used the initial two shoots which were for Trashy Content on her site as well... that was simply a bonus, extra content for her site that she had been paid for by TrashyContent.

The original content was what was used to create a site for her by another company... sold before we even planned to do her a site. And as I stated in my answer regards Demi we make no promises about how and where the content is used... pretty standard for a content company, infact any photographer who pays a model and gets ID and model releases.

We then did a further shoot which we both paid her for as part of her site, but also said we would sell it through Trashy Content as well and if we sold any content of her we'd pay her a extra ?100 for each license.

And to clarify, when we work with a model we offer 3 options, they can come onboard with a 50/50 deal where neither party is paid for their work and both take 50% from the site, we offer part paid part %, where we pay a reduced day rate and 25% of the sites takings... or we just pay a straight day rate where the girl receives no % from the site...

In all situations it is totally the girls decision as to what deal they take... the likes of Louisa are on a part paid part % deal... so none of her days were just "expenses" another inaccuracy in your liable claims.

3. Are you the same Steve who promised Sapphire you wouldn't use her name on her site and then did just that?

Answer: We had again shot Sapphire for Trashy Content, yes we wanted to do her a site... we spoke to her several times about this... Finally I spoke to her about a 3 day shoot... I told her very clearly we would use it for a web based project, and create a site based on her... She agreed to the shoot...

Then several months later said she was contracted to someone and hadn't though we was going to do her a site, I pointed out the email I had sent her was very clear... obviously some models have selective memory. We would not shoot 3 days of 1 girl unless we was doing a site... especially considering we already had content of her from our original Trashy Content shoots...

Again there was no discussion about the name of the site, and using or not using any names, in Sapphires opinion she didnt even know we were doing a site, luckily like you I keep all messages as I have learnt how you can be a hero one minute to the model and the next minute the villain !

4. And why did you suddenly stop paying Brook in March even though your arrangement was to keep paying her for the work she did?

Answer: We we're not paying Brook, our partners in the USA Traffic Gigolos were paying Brook... due to problems with that partnership including what happened to Brook we are no longer in partnership with that company, luckily we managed to get the domain www.BrookLittle.com back before we finished that partnership.

I fought hard for Brook (and 1 other model who was also effected) but to most degree my hands we're tied. Likewise I have plenty of messages from Brook sayign how she doesnt blame me and knows it's totally down to the americans.

5. You basically seem to be offering girls their own websites and getting them to work for expenses only and all the while you are selling a percentage of that content to other people!!!!

Answer: No we shoot for TrashyContent.com that is pretty much how we shoot all the girls, if they work out then yes we look at doing a site with them... however the content shot for Trashy Content still remains content we sell on... we sell a limited amount of licenses, but it does go to other companies who use it for web based projects amongst other things...

We do not get a girl onboard to do a website and then shoot content for free, only to sell it on. This is totally untrue and a liabless comment on our name, one you will definetly pay for.

6. I don't particularly like you or your methods because you give all of us hardworking decent people a really bad name. Yeah, sure you have some nice looking sites and I'm sure you have a great setup... but so would everyone if they conned so many models like you seem to do. I've yet to speak to any model who's has a decent ride with you guys so the next time you want to try to threadjack someone make damn sure they don't have a story to tell about you.

Answer: "all of us hardworkfing decent people" please that as to be the most untrue statement so far... since your post I have spoke to Beth and she summed you up with the following comments "hes a pure wanker" "hes a fuckin weirdo and a complete prick" She tells me you messaged her regually including 5 times in 1 hour, asking her stuff like "been fucked over yet" "how much money have you been paid this week? so and so made this amount of money" and how I would fuck her over and how you'd do her such a better deal...

So sounds to me like your trying to stab me in the back... trying to get the models who work for me to come over to your company... I can understand why, I mean then you can get them to bounce up and down on aresol cans, realy classy lol.

So you dont like me, you'll be glad I dont have any opinion on you... your more than welcome to come and meet me in Milton Keynes and discuss business and how we conduct business if you want, I know my partner would be very keen to discuss your comments.

Threadjack lol... I was simply wishing Brook well as I did when Demi told me she had a site, a story to tell, now at last some truth, thats exactly what it is a STORY, pure fiction... LIES, Liabless lies...

We do every thing we can for the girls who work with us... have a look at my PureStorm profile... nothing but positive praise for us. Hardly comments that fit a company who rip people off...

Anyways I am done, email me your address and I will get my lawyers to send you a letter, I hope your doing as well as you suggest to the models you approach, like my ones when your trying to poach them ! That will mean more money for me when I sue you for LIABLE, see you and your witnesses in court...

Thanks for admitting we have great sites

I would be interested to see how you can sue me for libel when - if you bother to actually read my post - I asked if you were that Steve.

Asking a question is not libel... since you have had the opportunity to respond that you seem not to be that Steve after all.

On the note of what 'Beth' is supposed to have said.
If I did text her 5 times in one hour, that was because we were having a text conversation.
I have copies of emails though that specifically do mention a specific Steve who she is very unhappy with.

Mustn't be you then.
Whoever it was, apparently sold material to a company that he had not paid the model for because the implicit agreement was to build a site together.
The model was eventually paid a paltry sum by way of grudging compensation.

Again, must be another Steve.

LOL... is that called a side step... offering me a olive branch...

Well yeah that other Steve sounds like a terrible person... what a coincidence he has worked with all the same models as me...

Let's put it in black and white... you work with a model, or model's... you do all you can for them... you work your ass off... your a hero ! They give you glowing reports, you can do no wrong !

Then something doesnt quite go how they had hoped, or they take a change of direction... and suddenly your the villain in it all...

So just to repeat... we have never ripped any one off, we have always shot girls initially for our content company TrashyContent.com and with these shoots it is made very clear the content is for re sale, with no guarantee as to how the content will be used...

Some of the girls we've got on with well and done sites for... maybe if I can lay a fault at our door is the knowledge/skill to monitorise our great sites, a fact that we are equally sad about trust me... This one of the reasons we partnered with the american company which also turned into a great disapointment, which I cant discuss in more detail ironically due to legal action happening over that matter... yes we're suing them as well !

So Daz, I dont know you... it feels like you have it in for me, when you dont even truely know me... good luck to you, good luck to Demi, good luck to Brook... I actually really mean that, if you can do a better job for them then great... but we aint bad people, my offer for you to come and meet us is a open offer...

Sounds maybe like I have possibly been listening to only one side then perhaps - I mean about this other Steve.
Personally I don't 'have it in' for anyone but whenever I approach a model I consistently get the cold-shoulder and the reasons are all the same.
Someone ripped them off.
I get so annoyed about it that whenever I hear this story because it makes my life a lot more complicated than it needs to be. I make much less than I could simply because I have never ripped anyone off in all the years I've been a photographer and I'm sitting on a back catalogue of work that I could sell but just won't because I have been asked not to.
Yes I have releases etc. but when I am asked nicely I comply.
Now I have another side of this particular story I will apologize and not bring the subject up again. I make it clear that this is not due to a threat of litigation because I know something of libel and the question thing does the trick every time.
No I apologize unreservedly because I find that I actually may have been wrong about you and public slagging matches go on for ever and can get terribly messy.

If you wish me well, as is implied, then I will wish you the same and leave it at that.

(all the same, I think that "Pure Wanker" is a bit strong from Beth - but then I welcome feedback of all kinds).

Ok Daz... well hopefully no one will jump to conclusions over the original post... and yes your right there is usually two sides to every story... or is it 3 (yours, myn and the truth, yeah I know quoting Take That isnt cool !)

And yes I was very sincere about wishing you all good luck, damn I will pobably start upselling your sites in our members area lol...

If your ever down this way give me a shout and we'll go for a beer so you can meet me in person... you may not still like me, but at least it will be an informed decision...

Deal!

Agreed, and thank you.
!thumbsup!

brook is lovley - she deserves more exposure.

i joined skinserotica as they advertised her but the sets wern't up...go figure.

i hope she does uk mag levels soon