Tired and jaded, looking for class acts

[Donna]

Well I wouldn't say I am your conventional model, however I am definitely fun (and a little bit nuts) to work with.

Drop me a mail, and can see what we can organise maybe?

Donna
xxx

donna@fun-with.me.uk

[Tanya Cox]

Hi Richard,

Im down south on tuesday if you wanted to shoot me again,

ill email you direct hun

Luv Tanya

XXXX

[Mysteryman]

I wondered when Richard would start to run short of models. His work is always excellent, he gets the girls talking naturally, his exploits in the Sussex countryside (have I spelt that right - I'm sure he'll get the pun) sometimes border on the daring but he has a niche which, unlike other videos in this market, doesn't bear (spelling again??) too much repetition each individual.


Hope he can come up with more girls, or perhaps a new angle, as he has helped many girls get wider recognition and opened them up (oh dear, puns again) to a wider audience.

[tj the cameraman]

I wonder Toybox, so who of theses are well known ? Sarah Jane, Christina X, Barbii Bucxxx, Gilly Sampson yes i agree are well known but must admit not heard or seen anything from the others.
RGB i hear from quite a few girls who you have shot to be told there stuff will be on the site soon, when is soon ??? as i keep hearing you dont update your site, 5 years on and still the same front page, same girls and no updates, yes there well known but would be niice to see some change in a website, nothing personal just my opinion chaps.

[rgb]

Hi tj

UKPussyTalk is updated every week as you can see if you click the Updates link on the front page. It has been updated regularly every week since the beginning of 2006.

The front page stays much the same because I have found, by analysing sales, that certain combinations of girls on the top of the front page generate higher sales.

[Mysteryman]

tj the cameraman said:

"RGB i hear from quite a few girls who you have shot to be told there stuff will be on the site soon, when is soon ??? as i keep hearing you dont update your site, 5 years on and still the same front page, same girls and no updates"

Obviously tj the cameraman has never visted the site. It is updated every 7 - 10 days, OK the front page may not change, so what? The content is added to with at least a 15 -30 minute video every time.

As to him "hearing" that girls have to wait for their "stuff" to be on site - what a total load of rubbish. Richard regularly posts on here detailing who he has shot and also posts every time he puts up a new full length interview and the gap between shooting and adding the content to the site is normally a few weeks - unlike a good number of other sites run by professinal outfits, not one man on his own.

Perhaps tj ought to trawl through the old posts on here, go look at the site and then, having found out what a prat he's made of himself, offer Richard an apology.

I've no connection with Richard apart from, from time to time, taking a 3 month membership and exchanging a few personal emails. As an amateur tog of a similar age, I've nothing but admiration (not to mention a great deal of envy) for his work and the value of his site - not to mention the tolerance of his miissus.

[rgb]

Thanks for the replies ( and kind words from Mysteryman et Al) I'm busy emailing people.

[rebecca ryder]

hi

yeah that right, when i done shoot with him few months ago, my stuff was up on the site within 3 or 4 weeks....and he advertised on here that he'd updated me xx

[rgb]

I've done a lot of outdoor shoots since the spring none of which have been published because they are for my upcoming OutdoorFrolixxx site, which I am still building. In some cases when I had the model down here I also did a red chair shoot on the off chance I might use it later.

Why I have to explain what I do with my own content, I dont know! !hmmm!

[Mysteryman]

Because, Richard, some people - mainly those who don't bother to subscribe or check their facts before putting fingers to keyboards - just want to cause controversy.

Unfortunately it doesn't take much thought to publish rubbish in any sort of Forum and, unlike when old codgers like you and I were taught to engage brain before putting mouth in gear, today it's seen as acceptable to publish any old rubbish as long as it serves the purpose of the author - and the press is in the lead when it comes to this.

Don't let them get to you - your site is different and I'm sure most of your models can put down some of their popularity to being featured on the red cahair.