egafd.com

Sam Slater wrote:

> Three problem areas.........

> 1) Pornstars making money on the side through escorting. The
> rise of girls who escort on the side has risen over the past 18
> months, as has the frequency of chlamydia outbreaks. Their
> agent swears their girls only use condoms. I say they're lying
> and the facts show the reality.

> 2) Male talent suffer from working with these girls and also
> lose money......so what do they do? They print their own tests.

> 3) Producers who've paid for the location, make-up and models
> don't like losing money, so let performers work with dodgy
> tests. As long as they get their scene done, the outbreak is
> someone else's problem.

> Problem number one has the knock-on affect and increases the
> likelihood of problems two and three. Stop booking girls that
> escort. Yes there'll be fewer girls to pick from, but vacuums
> always suck up new talent sooner or later, and you'll be
> respected more, and attracts a more professional performer.
>
> Also kick guys off set that turn up with fucking printed tests
> off their PC. They're only faking the tests because they're
> getting away with it. Stop their money, and they'll think twice
> about getting up at 6am to travel 3 hours to a scene only to be
> sent home with no money.

I agree with you on your points raised, Sam.

I have wanted to get into this Industry for a few yrs now, even since long before my test shoot with Layla, but a few things have stopped me.

1: My weight, when I'm not working, I get bored so I eat, & I find it difficult to lose weight when I'm in this circumstance. I highly doubt any1 would want to hire a guy with a podgy stomach, I'm not overly fat, but my stomach needs to be reduced first.

2: I've been concerned over the amount of porn ladies who sideline in escorting, this has always concerned me, due to unprotected/untested guys, who knows what they are spreading. Looking at some websites of certain porn ladies who have chatted/discussed work on this site, they openly display this fact on their websites about their extra curricular activities.

3: Due to partly the reasons in #2, the amount of infections/diseases that could potentially be spread around without the other porn actor's/actress's knowing what's happening outside of work.

Ages ago, I decided that when I do eventually get my chance in the Industry, there will be no way I will work with any actress who has done escorting. To me, my health is MORE IMPORTANT than risking a scene with an actress, who has done escorting.




P.S. NOT wanting to start arguments or hassle over the facts of escorting, just from a quick look at a couple of actress's own websites, they have openly displayed this on their sites. Also, I will NOT be naming names, either openly, or in PM/Email, so this should not contravene BGAFD rules.

And I suppose all the male performers never have sex, without condoms, off the set. Why are you laying all the blame on the girls?
STI's are on the increase within the general populace. People fuck around more and the use of condoms is decreasing. Bromide in the tea is the only answer.

Big Ears Pix wrote:

> And I suppose all the male performers never have sex, without
> condoms, off the set. Why are you laying all the blame on the
> girls?
> STI's are on the increase within the general populace. People
> fuck around more and the use of condoms is decreasing. Bromide
> in the tea is the only answer.

No1 has mentioned anything about the guys, I don't go looking at the Guys websites, so I can't say about their own out or work activities, but some women have specified what they do.

No doubt that some guys do get upto unsafe activities as well, but this thread was not started about guys, it was about females.

Yes, STI's are on the increase, but NO, Bromide is NOT the answer, it was proven over 20 yrs ago in Prisons to NOT work all the time.

If you are ever in need of a performer who is professional, clean and reliable! Lol
Please get in touch with me at: sirenenterprises@yahoo.co.uk

Stay Sexy!
DD.x

Jayce that wasnt aimed at you. It was a general comment. I thought i had replied to the original post from Belgravia but it turns out its linked to your post, sorry.

Big Ears,

Indeed, male performers having sex 'socially' without protection can indeed bring std's into the industry, just like the girl performers social lives. Going out with friends and happening to fall for someone in a club for a night of lustful sex is something we cannot legislate for.

When it comes to escorting though, being a 'profession' we can legislate and keep out of the industry.

This isn't a males v females debate. The guys that print their own tests are just as irresponsible, as are the directors who turn a blind eye in the name of the mighty ???

I think people have got it wrong. The problem I think is with 'the guys' not neccessarily with the girls. There are so few good studs in this business that obviously these few select guys get used more. SO....the guys are working with more girls each month, than an individual girl works with guys. That's why i am saying, girls be choosy who you work with.

Is that clear, erm i think it is. lol

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 071068.ece

This is a link to an article about the ease with which people can falsify documentation which inflates their earnings etc .. there are websites which will produce convincing P60s and bank statements etc. Elsewhere in this thread it was mentioned that performers might 'print off' their own tests. Could it be possible that some of these websites offer such false documentation, for example for insurance purposes ? Just a thought ....

That's ignorance and purely words without thought.

Be choosy who you work with? So girl goes escorting in Dubai for a week of unprotected sex, with a guy who probably pays other escorts on a regular basis, and then she comes home and her being 'choosy' who she works with solves the problem?

Even if the girl isn't escorting, and is choosy who she works with, it still doesn't work, because if the guy you choose, and think IS trust worthy, may have worked with someone who isn't trustworthy the day/week before working with you.