Page 2 of 2
Re: certs
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:38 pm
by adultpaulstar2006
TAKE IT FROM ME , EVERYBODY KNOWS.
PAUL XXX
Re: certs
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 2:39 pm
by adultpaulstar2006
YOU ARE A GODESS, BYE THE WAY
paul XXX
planeterotica
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:03 pm
by videokim
Just puzzled on your answer to Josephine question, how would condoms cause the end of British porn? the certs are not worth the paper they are printed on as HIV & STD's can spread in the period between tests.
Quite a few of the British porn stars have come to their senses now & only use condoms, a stud can preform with or without if they are good & what difference does it make to the film because you still get the cum-shots at the end.
Kim xxx
Re: planeterotica
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:49 pm
by Sam Slater
How would you get the cum shot at the end? Through the eye is the easiest way to the bloodstream for the HIV virus. You can also get chlamydia in your eye & herpes.
Re: planeterotica
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 8:20 pm
by videokim
So its obvious then that condoms would help in this instance as it lowers the risk.
kim
Re: planeterotica
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 2:49 am
by planeterotica
videokim wrote:
> Just puzzled on your answer to Josephine question, how would
> condoms cause the end of British porn? the certs are not worth
> the paper they are printed on as HIV & STD's can spread in the
> period between tests.
> Quite a few of the British porn stars have come to their senses
> now & only use condoms, a stud can preform with or without if
> they are good & what difference does it make to the film
> because you still get the cum-shots at the end.
>
> Kim xxx
>
>planeterotica wrote.
Bareback porn by far outsells porn where protection is used, therefore most producers will insist on certs and bareback!oops!
Re: planeterotica
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:32 am
by videokim
I'm sorry i don't agree with that, where did you get them stats from as i would like to see them.
Saying this to new girls only pressures them into preforming without & it should always come down to the model involved not the producer.
Kim
Re: planeterotica
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:25 am
by planeterotica
videokim wrote:
> I'm sorry i don't agree with that, where did you get them stats
> from as i would like to see them.
> Saying this to new girls only pressures them into preforming
> without & it should always come down to the model involved not
> the producer.
>
planeterotica wrote.
Well im sorry but i disagree with the fact that it always comes down to the model, if a producer states that it is a bareback shoot then it is the model who decides wether to take the job or not but the producer pays the money and calls the tune.
Re: planeterotica
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 10:43 am
by Sam Slater
The stats can probably be read in sex shops and online stores. I don't watch that much porn tbh...........no really it's true, but I would never buy a 'condom only' dvd. I've seen the odd clip, and it doesn't look right.
I'd also hazard a guess that most girls & guys in the industry hate using them too. There's no way girls will want to be rammed up the ass all day when the condom is burning away the walls of her colon & vagina.
The best way of preventing HIV and other STD's is for performers to be tested on a rugular basis, to stay away from drugs (where needles are used), to have a regular sexual partner at home, to only work with tested performers, and to stop escorting at weekends for extra cash.
Re: certs
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:09 pm
by smeeagain
Print their own ? You mean they're forging them ? Seriously ?