egafd.com

BTW, can we please be specific when allotting names to XNKs that it's
that of an already-listed actress, rather than (as I initially thought)
just a name? There was no url that I could see, so...
Another reason for putting such things in a new thread....

jj wrote:

> BTW, can we please be specific when allotting names to XNKs
> that it's
> that of an already-listed actress, rather than (as I initially
> thought)
> just a name? There was no url that I could see, so...
> Another reason for putting such things in a new thread....
----------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, you are right. It's confusing.

Here is the initial "Shkolnitsa 4" review; claiming XNK7769 could be
Margarita N.
Post from: 02-25-17 21:07 by Johray1




Margarita N.


XNK7769

But there was a clickable link to Margarita N.'s egafd page in my original post.

I've thought that is the most optimal way to link names to their pages;
that instead of filling the posts with clickable long urls there would be names of
movies and actresses and those names would be clickable.

Maybe it's not always easy to spot the different color in the names that should make the reader know it's a link then, I guess.
So perhaps it's more convenient to also show the actual url
instead of just making the name clickable and directing to that page.

I am constantly trying to improve the clearness of my often long reviews
so I will learn from this too and try to apply it to possible future posts.

Airola wrote:

> But there was a clickable link to Margarita N.'s egafd page in
> my original post.
>
> I've thought that is the most optimal way to link names to
> their pages;
> that instead of filling the posts with clickable long urls
> there would be names of
> movies and actresses and those names would be clickable.
>
> Maybe it's not always easy to spot the different color in the
> names that should make the reader know it's a link then, I
> guess.
> So perhaps it's more convenient to also show the actual url
> instead of just making the name clickable and directing to that
> page.
>
> I am constantly trying to improve the clearness of my often
> long reviews
> so I will learn from this too and try to apply it to possible
> future posts.
----------------------------------------

Think jj only wanted to encourage posting an excluded thread if it comes
to IDs for XNKs.

Like:
XNK7769 = Margarita N.

plus a link to this thread and/or caps of the on-screen ID and the
particular girls... whatever, to make it evident.

Airola wrote:
> But there was a clickable link to Margarita N.'s egafd page in
> my original post.
... in an already over-complex thread that required the opening of
several new windows.


> I am constantly trying to improve the clearness of my often
> long reviews

There are a few basics:
with exceptions, the admins will be unfamiliar with the girls and the
films. Assume we're morons (true, in my case) : -)

by all means back-and-forth with other forumites - a happy consensus
usually results;

BUT if a conclusion results after a lengthy discussion, please post
the conclusion ONLY as a new thread (e.g. XNK____ is Dilara Kerfuffle,
and the latter's url if already listed), with a link to the thread in
which the discussion took place That way we've got a clear statement
of the changes to be made and can skim-check the discussion that led
to them;

If the new info is a minor adjustment to a thread that's already been
dealt with and the thread is off the first page, it's usually better to
open a new one.

Ok, got it

Thanks.
Sorry to harp on about this, but I've just returned to work full-time and
so time here is even more limited.
The quicker we can read/process submissions, the quicker your stuff
goes up; and everybody wins : -)

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.