Re: XNK5559 = XNK6857
Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2015 9:35 pm
See, I am a simple lad and would never put "info" onto the as given truth, when I am
not sure it is...
And honestly I don't know these guy's reputations!
And then: If you compare it with something you trust..
Does that mean Holding "The truth"??
If you missed some mistakes your favourite informer obviously produced
and only recall his achievements...
And no. I never said that I can proof she is called Mandy.
I only pointed out that there is a source who claims to know her name.
In the end it woud mean (and that would be a point to be taken seriously
for we all know the web is not a holy item for must users)
that one can/should only produce info from "hard-copies" etc.. one owns..
It's a bit weird like with that "Sylvia" thing.
My issue only knows her as Sylvia. Yours is different.
So, am I a "risky" informer by now?
I just took what I have and one MUST believe the Horny Heaven guys should know
best, for sure.. You see what I mean?
Where to start, where to end this issue?!
not sure it is...
And honestly I don't know these guy's reputations!
And then: If you compare it with something you trust..
Does that mean Holding "The truth"??
If you missed some mistakes your favourite informer obviously produced
and only recall his achievements...
And no. I never said that I can proof she is called Mandy.
I only pointed out that there is a source who claims to know her name.
In the end it woud mean (and that would be a point to be taken seriously
for we all know the web is not a holy item for must users)
that one can/should only produce info from "hard-copies" etc.. one owns..
It's a bit weird like with that "Sylvia" thing.
My issue only knows her as Sylvia. Yours is different.
So, am I a "risky" informer by now?
I just took what I have and one MUST believe the Horny Heaven guys should know
best, for sure.. You see what I mean?
Where to start, where to end this issue?!