Re: Please ID this Private Girl (another)
Posted: Wed May 13, 2015 8:48 pm
jj wrote:
> I've frequently been extremely rude about the unwatchability
> and
> pointlessness of these scenes : -)
I picked some of them because of the cover but then you realise about the "unwatchability" (perfect word) and discard immediately further temptations. I saw a couple of new castings scenes online (now outside Private company) and seems that are different. Woodman is no longer the "star" and the filming is really more pro.
> I'd rather watch her in her heyday, with that weirdly-alluring 3/4-cut
> bush, than see her do those three last-gasp real anals with her face like
> a bag of spanners and her body-language screaming "noooooooooooo....".
Hahahaha, you're right about the body language.
But, I don't know, I think that I can forgive that for Deborah.
In fact, somebody must start a petition online, gathering signatures to ask her to perform MILF scenes RIGHT NOW!!!
> I've frequently been extremely rude about the unwatchability
> and
> pointlessness of these scenes : -)
I picked some of them because of the cover but then you realise about the "unwatchability" (perfect word) and discard immediately further temptations. I saw a couple of new castings scenes online (now outside Private company) and seems that are different. Woodman is no longer the "star" and the filming is really more pro.
> I'd rather watch her in her heyday, with that weirdly-alluring 3/4-cut
> bush, than see her do those three last-gasp real anals with her face like
> a bag of spanners and her body-language screaming "noooooooooooo....".
Hahahaha, you're right about the body language.
But, I don't know, I think that I can forgive that for Deborah.
In fact, somebody must start a petition online, gathering signatures to ask her to perform MILF scenes RIGHT NOW!!!