egafd.com

Deuce Bigolo wrote:
> Quite frankly if a female pornstar has done nothing but one
> genre
> .... high end art? (racquel darrian & derek lane)
> the male pornstar could be different everytime and you could
> still feel like your watching a re-run of the first

With Darrian, that'd be because she couldn't act her way out of a paper-bag
even if her life depended on it : -))

I think she might have skipped acting classes to work on her butt

Wise choice

Being paired with Derek Lane truly must have been the highlight of her porn career. Watching their scenes together was dull as hell.

I'm totally with you on this jj, but bear in mind that I have just consumed a large glass of the finest Oz shiraz.
A female is not a porn actress unless she is eager (not just willing) to rutt, fuck, swallow and suck whichever male(s) are presented to her. That's the career she chose when she got fed up with teaching, waitressing, nursing, unemployment, or whatever. If she is not up for that then she is a cheat and a fraud. I have no interest whatsoever in watching some woman having sex with her husband or boyfriend. Ugh!

Much more eloquently-put than my initial whinge.
I'll obviously have to change beverages. Or perhaps combine them......

Scotch and Shiraz? Let us know how you get on. !drink!

My point of view exactly, but it is not always possible even for a knowledgeable porn consumer to know whether the male or female is screwing a siggnificant other in a scene or a movie.

Will do.
I'm installing an ADSL line in the lavatory.

Perhaps they could supply a promiscuity-certificate as well as the usual ones.....

It's a thought, jj. But if I was a porn producer I'd stick with the casting couch. Nothing beats a test drive. !wink!