egafd.com

I have about 120 pictures of girls who can be either american either european, but I think most of them are european; I have other 50 pictures (some of which are in consistent number from the same sets) that I'm pretty sure are all european, not too famous, girls of late 80ies-early 90ies; finally I have some pics that I have assigned to various girls, more or less popular, about which I am not sure and that I am leaving as last questions.

I don't want to be a problem, but it's hard for me to think that my posts could be considered spamming as Forbidden did (unless he intended to limit such qualification to my O/T discussion with jj or Texxx about linguistic curiosities or comics, etc.: if so, i can say that I often got - with big relish - into discussion already started; and, if sometimes I was the starter, I did it just because I've seen that the thing happened).
Apart from the mental exercice or gymnastic, that is a very good argument, I would expose other two considerations: 1) if I send just the pics of surely european girls, could happen that I exclude some pic of not surely but actually european girls, and so the community could lose some contribution that for some fellow could be interesting and useful (to practically exemplify, after this post I'll send another triad: I think these girls are all european, but maybe I'm wrong; would I have to detract them to the community?); 2) the subjects (euro and american porn) are strictly linked each other and I think it is neither philologically correct nor practically useful to draw such a severe distinction between them: it would be so as if one, studying latin culture, avoids the reading of greek writers or viceversa. To say, Carol Lynn is american or European? Gabrielle Scream is american or european? And Tracy Adams? And, to the other side, Deidre Holland what is? (obviously the forum has a privileged subject and I intend respect it: but is it a lack of respect to submit a pic for an ID, involving the question ?Is she an american or an euro girl??)

3rd, less serious, argument: I don't like mature stuff: would I have the right to ask for the banning of posts about this subject, appealing to the circumstance that this site is dedicated to girls? !happy! I don't think so

Hell, I enjoy a bit of mental "exercice" as much as the next pervert. !hangover!

chiavatorcortese wrote:
> obviously the forum has a [...] subject and I intend
> respect it

That, apart from your ISP suddenly going out of business, appears to be the most that I can hope for, so thank you for that, and future consideration on the aims of this forum.

The individual performers you brought up, presumably in order to fudge the issue and continue showing us your shit, can all capably be answered in the FAQ and forum archives. Questionable cases always merit discussion, but there's little point in calling foul on my inital "percentages" assessment, as anyone can look at your post history and see for themselves the number of obviously-US-based productions; the photos culled from CD-ROM collections and/or newsgroup sources: stills taken directly from the sets because pure-web content wasn't as prevalent as it is today. If you're now making an effort not to post off-topic material, well, then, I appreciate that.

I have to say my [snap, unstatistical] impression is that at least
half of your pics have been of US perfs.
Of course, if you [necessarily] don't know who they are at the start
you could hardly know from which continent they originate- although
to the more experienced eye there are clues in settings, decors and
male cast-members.....

> The individual performers you brought up, presumably in order
> to fudge the issue and continue showing us your shit

Fly down, Forbidden: I have not injured you, and this is more important than the heart of the matter!

The individual performers I brought up are very consistent evidences that it's not the case to distinguish so severely the subjects. If one does not know or does not recognize Tracy Adams in a scene where she works with a well known euro guy, how can he know that the girl is off topic?

> That, apart from your ISP suddenly going out of business,
> appears to be the most that I can hope for, so thank you for
> that, and future consideration on the aims of this forum.

Don't invest too much in your hope: I say that I intend to respect the forum rules, but this means that when I'll be not certain that the girls are off topic, I'll post their pics. And until the moderators will not say nothing against my posts, I'll go ahead. Anyway, I think that if you are right and some moderator will intervene, I'm sure he will do with the good manners you have not.

I gave me the pleasure to control all my posts (that's why my answer come only now), and I confirm you must buy a new calculating machine; ask jj which kind, 'cause the one he has runs almost perfectly: about 55% are eurogirls. This could be anyway a too low percentage, considered the matter of this forum; but in the remaining 45% there are a lot of pictures about which I was doubtful and other about which I was even sure - evidently mistaking - that they were eurogirls. I remember a picture that I believed was Anita Rinaldi or Hana Melonova and jj pointed out she was Johnny Black. If you want, you can see that is very difficult to establish that a pic is off topic

chiavatorcortese wrote:

> Anyway, I think that if you are right and some
> moderator will intervene, I'm sure he will do with the good
> manners you have not.

Obviously eliminate ?I think that? !shocked!

chiavatorcortese wrote:
> I have about 120 pictures [...] I have
> other 50 pictures [...] finally I have some
> pics that I have assigned to various girls [...]

Then, if good manners are of such importance, I would in all sincerity suggest that you post the remainder of your Garbage Dump Theatre in ONE THREAD. Everyone wins: you get to "enjoy the genious" of the people who feel like pandering to you, and it's easier for others to bypass your constant pleas.

Thank you, and Godspeed in your odd quest.

To bypass my posts is very easy anyway. Do it

You are new to this forum and I have not read your previous posts (counter says 42). Why are you so aggressive towards Chavator and why are you so dismissive of people who have provided information in response to his requests?
You do not have to read these posts and you need not bother your brain cells in responding. Just cross the street and let the parade go by.
I and JJ have already indicated we do not find these posts bothersome in the least, and suggestion has been made to you to avoid reading or posting comments, but it is now you that is most irritating and discourteous.

====================================================
Author: forbidden
Date: 08-05-09 11:19

chiavatorcortese wrote:
> I have about 120 pictures [...] I have
> other 50 pictures [...] finally I have some
> pics that I have assigned to various girls [...]

Then, if good manners are of such importance, I would in all sincerity suggest that you post the remainder of your Garbage Dump Theatre in ONE THREAD. Everyone wins: you get to "enjoy the genious" of the people who feel like pandering to you, and it's easier for others to bypass your constant pleas.

Thank you, and Godspeed in your odd quest.

Len801 wrote:
> You are new to this forum

No, Len, I've been here for years. Contribute whenever I see an opportunity, but work and moderating other places meant I couldn't spend as much time as I'd like. I spend most of my time here reading; the development of the database, film reviews, and so on.


> Why are you so aggressive towards Chavator

His posts are a self-serving waste of space, IMO, and his attitude seems to be that he's above common netiquette. A few IDs a month, fine, but some guy's entire porn collection, over 10 years? Why should anyone have to navigate around that, coming in as it does, every day? Fuck him; get rid of the selfish twats, or put them in their own little cubbyhole = better forum.


> and why are you so dismissive of people who have
> provided information in response to his requests?

Dismissiveness not intended. If that's your choice, fine, good for you. It seems common practice for some to take advantage of the all-round geniality, though. I initially tried to be constructive, but have a different view to you and JJ. Without an ignore-list, here, or separate ID section, I can but voice my complaint.

At this point, I don't really care if I'm considered discourteous towards Chia. Although the language barrier makes it a bit like kicking a cripple.

forbidden wrote:

> ....It seems common practice for some to take advantage of
> the all-round geniality, though. I initially tried to be
> constructive, but have a different view to you and JJ.

I've laid into a few of the worse offenders in my time : -)
If pics are thumbed or otherwise hyperlinked then I don't mind as
it takes just a few seconds to have a quick peek. I tend to draw
the line at clips, though, as I fail to see why I should hang about
waiting for the damn' things to buffer- in the latter case people
should make caps instead and upload them; we're all under time-
constraints and I find the tacit assumption that we have nothing
better to do both patronising and annoying.
Human nature means that few new[ish] posters bother to read
the FAQs and many people anyway have rather poor netiquette.