Page 2 of 3
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 3:27 pm
by alec
The problem is whether Adrienne [2] is the same as Adriana. If not to which one should the new title and the new alias be added?
The Adrienne entries are six years later (where they have dates) and the two girls look different though possibly with some help from a cosmetic surgeon and a tattooist.
I suspect the history of these two entries is quite complicated, and I don't want to merge them again wrongly if they were split in the past (as I suspect they may have been). I know unknowns were involved at some stage and I'm confused by the fact the post is headed Adrienne [2] with the picture being of Adriana.
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 5:55 pm
by Johray1
Haven't the slightest knowing about the entry-histories of Adrienne [2] and Adriana, of course.
The post Tederoni2 replied to is from 2005 and hence probably from that periode when
both girls were still merged as one in one profile...
That's the only explaination I could think of... !sherlock!
__________________________________________________________
The film those pics are posted for is "Inzest in der Familie - z?rtliche Geschwister"
and is listed in the the "filmographie" of
"Adriana"
That's all I believe to understand...
!blush!
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:37 pm
by Johray1
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 6:51 pm
by Tederoni2
The caps I posted should be for Adriana.
To me, Adrienne [2] looks like a different person (although very simular).
The original post has a pic wrongly associated to Adrienne [2].
This is a tough one.
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 9:59 pm
by alec
Thanks, and thanks to Tederoni. I've added a couple of the pics. BTW the aspect ratio of the pictures is wrong. The full-screen ones in the original post reduce to 720 by 586 when they should reduce to 720 by 540. So the pics I posted were corrected accordingly.
(First time I've had to point this out for a while.)
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:33 pm
by Tederoni2
The aspect ratio issue is my fault. I had to change it from the source. The vid was stretching horizontally, so I compensated by changing each to 1024/768.
I think since they are not all cropped identically, and then further distorted by image sharing...that threw it off.
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2016 10:38 pm
by alec
I understand the complications. See my reply in the Voll im Arsch thread.
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:23 am
by deezer
alec wrote:
>>(First time I've had to point this out for a while.)
Last time was
10-18-2015 IIRC. !drink!
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 8:17 pm
by Tederoni2
Re: Adrienne [2]
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:09 pm
by Johray1
Tederoni2 wrote:
> Wanna get really confused?
>
XNK7244
> looks very simular to our
>
Adriana
---------------------------------
Na, not really. They look pretty different, IMHO.
Adriana has a soft, cute-ish face while XNK7244 doesn't...
Don't you find?
[IMG]http://img182.imagevenue.com/loc9/th_60745_a1_123_9lo.jpg[/IMG]