Morons defending Jihadi John
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Bernard
Always a good idea to read a thread first.
It would help you to avoid making senseless comments like "always defending..." when as you can see from below, I clearly am not defending Cage and their idiotic comments about "Jihadi John".
It would help you to avoid making senseless comments like "always defending..." when as you can see from below, I clearly am not defending Cage and their idiotic comments about "Jihadi John".
Re: Randyandy
As previously stated gimp and fukwits be offended.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
DJ
David Johnson wrote:
> According to Cage, a lovely guy was turned into a heartless
> accomplice to barbaric murder because of the Security Services.
>
> This strikes me as Grade A bullshit to argue that a sweet guy
> was turned into a murderer of innocent journalists and charity
> workers as a result of being picked on by the security
> services.
Indeed. Complete bollocks. Not least because it totally sidesteps the question as to why the security services were "picking on him" in the first place.
> According to Cage, a lovely guy was turned into a heartless
> accomplice to barbaric murder because of the Security Services.
>
> This strikes me as Grade A bullshit to argue that a sweet guy
> was turned into a murderer of innocent journalists and charity
> workers as a result of being picked on by the security
> services.
Indeed. Complete bollocks. Not least because it totally sidesteps the question as to why the security services were "picking on him" in the first place.
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Andrew
Why on earth would anyone be offended by your post? You are clearly talking pure shite.
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: DJ
When we catch him I hope he is made to suffer for a long time before he dies.
Re: Bernard
did I mention you ?
don't always believe you own self importance.
don't always believe you own self importance.
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Bernard
Well you are responding to my post in the thread, Bernard......
-
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Argie
There seems to be rather more mud-slinging going around on this post than
is really necessary. I think we are all agreed that Jihadi John is an appalling
person and if he is the Brit they think he is I hope justice in the shape of
something terminally unpleasant happens to the swine one day soon !
is really necessary. I think we are all agreed that Jihadi John is an appalling
person and if he is the Brit they think he is I hope justice in the shape of
something terminally unpleasant happens to the swine one day soon !
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:40 am
Re: Argie
frankthring wrote:
I think we are all agreed that Jihadi
> John is an appalling
> person and if he is the Brit they think he is I hope justice
> in the shape of
> something terminally unpleasant happens to the swine one day
> soon !
A nice pinpoint drone strike should do the job nicely. Though many would quite understandably argue that would be too quick and merciful for him.
I think we are all agreed that Jihadi
> John is an appalling
> person and if he is the Brit they think he is I hope justice
> in the shape of
> something terminally unpleasant happens to the swine one day
> soon !
A nice pinpoint drone strike should do the job nicely. Though many would quite understandably argue that would be too quick and merciful for him.