egafd.com

Even if he knew, like I said, it's less important than 93 families losing their homes. That's what the Sun should concentrate on but they didn't. Ignore the big issues and exaggerate the tittle-tattle.

Like I said, I'm not fan of Brand and think he's a bit of a pillock, but even pillocks can do decent things now and again. The fact they're attacking him for doing something nice for some working class folk tells us where their priorities lie.

Sam, make your mind up.
First of all the possible increase in rent is a rumour.
However in your posts here you have used.
" most likely lose their homes."
"important than 93 families losing their homes."
"families who may lose their homes"

Sam Slater may fall in love with David Johnson, Sam Slater will fall in love
with David Johnson, Sam Slater is in love with David Johnson.
Which one is true.

Oh and sorry David to use your name, just that you and Sam do like to post
a lot.

Bitchy Bernard strikes again! !wink!

I did go a little overboard, didn't I Bernard?

But, again......my point stands. The future of those families is more important than Brand's arrangement with his landlord.

Am I wrong? If you were editor, where would your priorities lie between the two?