egafd.com

Jim now has to pace himself since he found out he cant retire until he's 67, so show some sympathy for the poor man who has to continue shagging all those gorgeous young girls for a few more years before he gets a pension !wink!

Not casting aspersions...obviously.

I state that I have no idea whether the accusation was right or wrong.

I state that I suspect it must have been wrong otherwise Admin would not have deleted the thread.

As far as I am aware he hasn't posted since the accusation. I state this in response to Max's question.

If you want to twist the above in your increasingly pathetic attempt to score points off me, be my guest. It is however, very, very silly.

His sqezze logged on to adultwork yesterday and was accessing from hungary....

David Johnson wrote:

> Not casting aspersions...obviously.
>
> I state that I have no idea whether the accusation was right or
> wrong.

No but you thought you might as well mention it anyway as it doesn't paint him in a favourable light.

"No but you thought you might as well mention it anyway as it doesn't paint him in a favourable light"

If the accusation was untrue and clearly Admin deleted the thread, then obviously it does not paint him in an unfavourable light.

Perhaps he was pissed off by the accusation and just decided I don't need this. Fair enough.

Personally I miss his posts which could be very funny. Obviously I didn't agree with a lot of his views but hey that is the internet. So what?

I will leave you to burrow around in this dustbin now. Don't get your shiny suit dirty! !wink!

Interesting comments there. I was kind of hoping this thread would someone resonate across the earth and reach Jimbo, wherever he is, and he would return to the forum to post. He must have a hard life, earning money by banging hot chicks. lol.

Or you could tweet to Jim and/ or Lara and get your answers direct from source

...Just a thought

Or disguise yourself as a delectable young fillie innocently wandering down the street, needless to say Mr Slip will then emerge from somewhere offering to roger you senseless..otherwise his site has taught me nothing.

I'm with you. I've no doubt David took the opportunity to remind us of Jim's little 'run-in', shall we say, because it was something negative...........but if the roles were reversed Jim would have done the same and you know it.

Therefore, it's all good.

"I've no doubt David took the opportunity to remind us of Jim's little 'run-in', shall we say, because it was something negative..........."

No. An accusation is only negative if it is proven. If it is not proven, it reflects more on the accuser than the accused.

Having said that I do not deny leaping to assumptions about accusations when Tory or Lib Dem politicians are involved!

However in this particular case of Jimbo, I state that I have no idea whatsoever if the accusation was true or not and suggest that since Admin deleted the thread, it would suggest that it wasn't. I find it hard to believe that the thread would have been deleted if Admin had ip evidence for example.

I could have ignored Max's question about why Jim wasn't posting on here or given the standard answer - he is shagging babes, but:

1. Jim shagged loads of babes last year and it didn't seem to stop him posting.

2. There appears to be a chronological connection between the original accusation and Jim no longer posting here.

3. Either way it is a shame - no posts of pictures of Stalin et.c to illustrate Jim's take on my political views.

"Therefore, it's all good"

Bit of a non sequitur.